5% happens roughly 5% of the time

where you can see/follow the current score? (ie how much doug is up)

*

Edit/MH: Please see OP.

over how many instances?

Pretty hot. DN caught an A on the river to take off DPs JJ, per DP's post-match interview. DN landed another big pot with a KK that held up for (i think) action on every street.

I watched each cast for a while. I'm coming to like Kakitee. Fees seemed a little arrogant and disengaged. Deeb was fine, and I liked some of their meta game discussion.

Overall, the gg cast was a bit better.

As I've noted, I like both DP and DN and really enjoy watching this.

When's the next session?

not sure if serious

I wonder how many times this will end up being asked ITT....


The tentative schedule is every other day at 10:30pm GMT, so tomorrow at 2:30pm PST should be the next match.

They said it will be Mon, Wed, Friday with weekends off most likely.

Fifty-fifty basically.

Fees makes everything about himself.

not really. it can happen 100% of time in short run.

To be honest, I'd like to hear some responses to this as well. Unfortunately, NVG has never been a place where people like to show their work.

Not that I'm saying he's playing well, I just don't know HUNL well enough to watch a few hundred hands without hole cards, then say with any confidence that someone is playing poorly (or well, for that matter).

And yes, before anyone says it, I know hole cards aren't an absolute necessity, either. Suppose, say, Negreanu had VPIP/PFR stats of 30/5. Or suppose he was getting to the river in 80 percent of his hands, but showing down five percent of those hands. In those cases, I wouldn't need hole cards to know he's playing suboptimally. But those are extreme examples that even a HUNL n00b like myself would be able to gauge.

Thus, I assume there are more subtle indicators that I can't see but for which other more experienced HUNL jockeys – particularly the ones who are so adamant about the relative playing levels – can provide insight. (Note: I have yet to watch the videos posted above, so perhaps that will help answer my question.)

Consensus seems to be that Daniels main leaks are his incorrect bet sizing and his passivity. He's checking back too much when he should be bluffing and letting Doug pick up a lot of small-medium pots for free with hands that are most likely folds.

He is however able to pick off big bluffs by Doug and get in some big value bets. But in the long run, the orphaned small pots add up to a huge number.

do you think the odds of a quarter being flipped heads is 50/50? will you bet me that out of 10 flips, it comes 5 heads and 5 tails?

He's playing pretty well, better than expected. As a general rule the higher the stakes a commentator plays, the more complimentary they have been about his play. It's the midwit 100nl pros who are have been the most vocal in their criticism.

Main take away for me has been just how good Doug is.

depends on the odds you're willing to offer?

no but i'll bet on one flip if u give me interesting enough odds

It happens around fifty / fifty, but without the ifty.

What odds are you comfortable with

You guys are either master trolls or dumb as rocks.

Sure. $100 for me if it's not 50/50 over 10 tosses. $100 for you if it is. Deal?

you got yourself a bet at $3.1 for my $1

LOL

I will if you will give 3.5 - 1.