Quote:
Originally Posted by DRybes
Wow, all you ****s in NVG really will tear someone apart and attempt to ruin a non-profit charity over speculation and wild ideas without waiting for facts to pop up. The replies here that are out of line are not by JW, they're by those of you telling JW how bad his posts are. YOu make 2+2 look like a joke by inviting someone to defend himself and then being unreasonable about his explanations.
The guy has answered every question and been transparent and detailed about the combination of circumstances that led to the mistake for which OP started this thread. In every post he took full responsibliity for it. And that wasn't enough for 90% of you. Start your ****ing witch-hunt when the signs actually point to something being amiss instead of a mistake. I have little respect for the tone of anyone in this thread, including a bunch of people who should know better.
how is your second post even close to accurate? he hasnt until 2 posts ago taken PERSONAL responsibility, he says he is while passing the buck in terms of why not tickets!
I wasnt gonna post anything in this thread at all, then the more and more i read...i just realised JW is in total defense mode and using the cancer charity as his crutch! ANY professional would have made the post i quoted before their first and only post...if it even got to that point!
why is this thread here right now? why couldnt JW use his due diligence to fix this before a 2+2 thread was created? how could JW say that he doesnt care what is said about him? if you are the head of a charity it better be important to you that people trust you...do you think charities get celebrities to sponsor their organizations for shi and giggles? NO, its for the recognition and trust (in a sense) that the public has for that celebrity (i.e. george clooney is def a better charity spokesman than bernie madoff--extreme example I know, but you get what I mean)
and to the defenders of JW...we dont have a problem with the charity, people with cancer or much else...the problem lies in the way that JW has gone about this matter, he started with painting himself as the victim while trying to vilify OP...then after the backlash he went into the "my bad, its my fault and i truly apologize shaun" mode...now we are here!
also, SKLANSKY is being as neutral an arbiter/observer as possible IMO...and he has researched JW's charity, and things just arent adding up in many ways! WTF, im tilted imma go read and then go to sleep!