Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz? Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz?

12-19-2016 , 04:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PTLou
If above is all true then all those players need to do is go play the "other " game and own the world. Ez game
- Not everyone has easy access to play live poker (I have to drive 2 hours and then put myself on a waiting list)
- It's harder to be rolled to play 1 table of 500NL than it is to mass table small stakes online.
- Live poker is depressing as hell, so many degenerates, so boring.

Quote:
Originally Posted by PTLou
Full disclosure. Which one are you ?
I've played both with success, online is much much tougher these days. Played about 2.5 million hands online before switching to live. 25NL online 3 years ago is still clearly harder than 200NL/500NL live now. I've never heard of anyone who has had success at both that thought online wasn't much tougher in today's climate. There are way fewer fish/table online, and the good players are a lot better.

Your analogy was bad because in online you play anyone in the world, whereas live you play anyone in your immediate area. Also live is mind-numbingly slow-paced so you gain tons of equity just by other people being impatient, which is not so much the case online.
Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz? Quote
12-19-2016 , 04:05 PM
Oh great, another discussion about how difficult 25NL is. Poker geniuses ITT lol
Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz? Quote
12-19-2016 , 04:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dream Crusher
Oh great, another discussion about how difficult 25NL is. Poker geniuses ITT lol
25NL 3 years ago was not difficult, that's the point. Live 200/500NL is a joke.
Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz? Quote
12-19-2016 , 04:21 PM
BTW you may be a troll but your sign up date and post count is real, so the joke is on you.
Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz? Quote
12-19-2016 , 04:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cooozy
25NL 3 years ago was not difficult, that's the point. Live 200/500NL is a joke.
let me try to understand this for you.

If a winning NL 100 or NL 200 player used their basic strat and could play 5-10 tables of 2/5 Live at the same time, they would crush (minus a little cuz no tools)

But they can only play one table of 2/5 Live at a time. So they would either have to adjust strat as strat that made them win at multitabling online wont work the same way on a single table of live.

If winning NL 100 /200 online playerss could crush a single table of 2/5 live for any sort of living wages, then rooms would have been infested with these players after black friday.

rooms are not infested with them.

thus they cant.

But if it makes you feel better to say you are boss and can crush 2/5 live and those players are all muppets because you are just that wicked smart then grats and merry Christmas.
Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz? Quote
12-19-2016 , 04:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PTLou
let me try to understand this for you.

If a winning NL 100 or NL 200 player used their basic strat and could play 5-10 tables of 2/5 Live at the same time, they would crush (minus a little cuz no tools)

But they can only play one table of 2/5 Live at a time. So they would either have to adjust strat as strat that made them win at multitabling online wont work the same way on a single table of live.

If winning NL 100 /200 online playerss could crush a single table of 2/5 live for any sort of living wages, then rooms would have been infested with these players after black friday.

rooms are not infested with them.

thus they cant.

But if it makes you feel better to say you are boss and can crush 2/5 live and those players are all muppets because you are just that wicked smart then grats and merry Christmas.
You are assuming that players want to sit in a casino all day long with a bunch of degenerates after losing the ability to play online poker. Well that isn't the case.

But you're defending the "everyone is good at something else and nobody is better than someone else" argument so good luck with it.
Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz? Quote
12-19-2016 , 04:59 PM
yeh ptlou you're diggin a pretty big hole here, i'd just stop
Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz? Quote
12-19-2016 , 05:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dream Crusher
Oh great, another discussion about how difficult 25NL is. Poker geniuses ITT lol


+1

I'm going to cuss out the next nerd who brings this up out of nowhere
Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz? Quote
12-19-2016 , 05:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelvis
You are assuming that players want to sit in a casino all day long with a bunch of degenerates after losing the ability to play online poker. Well that isn't the case.

But you're defending the "everyone is good at something else and nobody is better than someone else" argument so good luck with it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DangerNoodle
yeh ptlou you're diggin a pretty big hole here, i'd just stop

The mob has spoken. Its usually better to defer to the NVG mob as the NVG mob is usually correct.

I defer.

I take back all my recent posts calling out the lameness of online grinders basically saying lolliveplayers. my posts were flawed.
Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz? Quote
12-19-2016 , 09:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SageDonkey
I do not want bets with people on 2plus2, but my view is that the line should now be Mike Dentale as a 60%/40% favourite.

I say this based on the contents of the May/June podcast where Cate Hall came across as a rookie, and on some of the hands we know about such as value owning herself with KK against Todd Brunson and calling off with ATo against Barry Hutter.

I get that in some game dynamics not betting KK there for value loses a small amount of EV long term, but I still think it was safer to check back or to bet small if she is putting him on exactly TT/JJ/QQ as the only losing hands he'll call with. The ATo hand is just a totally standard pass and the 3 bet OOP with it was questionable to start with.

The two hands above are very standard spots that a competent player should not have got so badly wrong. It is not as if the hands were lost through misreads such as triple barreling with air and being looked up, these were both super standard spots.

So unless Cate Hall was just having bad day each time, I would say that she has made these fundamental errors many times before.

Mike Dentale on the other hand has been around a long time, so surely he cannot be novicey like that in standard spots. It is hard to evaluate how talented a player he is without having played against him a lot, but my guess is that he is at a minimum reliable and solid, whereas Cate Hall could be anything in ability, ranging from Novice+ to Good+

There is no way she is a brilliant player, not based on those two hands.

Mike Dentale did play weak tight in the hand with Sam Abernathy but also she had a fortunate run out on the river with a straightening flushing card coming and maybe you have to give her credit for following through rather than saying he made a terrible fold on the river.
Thank god for the clarification
Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz? Quote
12-19-2016 , 09:42 PM
If you were only dealt one hand every 90 seconds online and you could only play one table and there were no bots allowed and no outside programs of any kind allowed and you had to play in a room full of people, music, microphone noise, etc, online would be "a joke" too.

Comparing skill levels of online and live is ignorant at this point. Online is a very technical game and live is a very psychological game/they are two different games. Being good (or bad) at one game does not mean you will be good (or bad) at the other--> almost no live pros could get their same EV online, and vice versa.

Back to what's important...

Someone rich and reputable and in the know set a line (i.e. Hall -115/Dentale + 105) and start taking bets and then move the line as need be imo. The more action on this the more attention it will get obv. This could actually be really big for poker regardless of the outcome.
Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz? Quote
12-20-2016 , 12:46 AM
After podcast.

Mike >>>>>>>>>>> Cate

I retract half of my post calling both douches.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz? Quote
12-20-2016 , 01:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dream Crusher
All forms of poker are a complete joke because the vast majority of players aren't putting forth wholehearted effort to win. Any game where players aren't actually trying is going to be really easy for those that do try. Pro poker players think they are so smart but if they really were they wouldn't be wasting their lives away grinding this boring game for peanuts when there are far more lucrative business opportunities all around.
most of us are lazy gamers, poker is just another video game, to me it was just like farming gold in a game except it happened to be real money and allowed me to buy everything I needed in life, running a business is completely different
Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz? Quote
12-20-2016 , 01:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick_AA
After podcast.

Mike >>>>>>>>>>> Cate

I retract half of my post calling both douches.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
link?
Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz? Quote
12-20-2016 , 01:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fayth
link?


YouTube > joeingram1 > channel > videos
Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz? Quote
12-20-2016 , 01:46 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LbzMj4QQa_M


Says he has played plenty of heads up and does not want coaching.
Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz? Quote
12-20-2016 , 02:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PTLou
let me try to understand this for you.

If a winning NL 100 or NL 200 player used their basic strat and could play 5-10 tables of 2/5 Live at the same time, they would crush (minus a little cuz no tools)

But they can only play one table of 2/5 Live at a time. So they would either have to adjust strat as strat that made them win at multitabling online wont work the same way on a single table of live.

If winning NL 100 /200 online playerss could crush a single table of 2/5 live for any sort of living wages, then rooms would have been infested with these players after black friday.

rooms are not infested with them.

thus they cant.

But if it makes you feel better to say you are boss and can crush 2/5 live and those players are all muppets because you are just that wicked smart then grats and merry Christmas.
Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz? Quote
12-20-2016 , 02:19 AM
Why the heck do a podcast while driving? After 30 seconds of the neck shot I was done.
Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz? Quote
12-20-2016 , 02:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick_AA
After podcast.

Mike >>>>>>>>>>> Cate

I retract half of my post calling both douches.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What podcast are you talking about?
Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz? Quote
12-20-2016 , 03:37 AM
Listen to the pod don't watch it. But yeah he had some contradictions but some good qualities too. Of course he's presenting his best but he seems to value honorable traits and admit shortcomings (i.e. Lack of self control in conflict, short fuse, emotional , etc. )

Def comes from the hard knocks and his life experience is 200x more impressive than ms. Hall and he doesn't come off as I'm better than you. (Unless you say sompen he don't like).

I like when he said something like "hell if she beats me that will be funny and she can stick it to me " or something. It would destroy him after all the **** he said but at least he sees it would be hilarious for us and can laugh about that part.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz? Quote
12-20-2016 , 04:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PTLou
livepokerlol is just asas senseless as liveBasketballol if you are a Football player.

live and online are simply different games.

saying a pro Basketball player is bad because he couldnt play center in the NFL if his life depended on it is... well... sorta dumbish.

.
wrong
Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz? Quote
12-20-2016 , 04:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SSKS
And I bet a nl200 grinder online couldn't beat 25/50 live with dentale or care on the same table. Your point is moot


Onlinepokerlol
wrong. if we have 4 dentales and 4 halls at the table average winning 200nl online grinder will KILL murder pillage and rape over any meaningful sample. u don't know wtf u're talking about. u prolly don't even play poker outside donkaments and drunken 1/2 with your buddies or home game. u prolly think degreanu is goat and wear dark or reflective glasses when u play.u're prolly over 45 and hate "those online kids". if u saw phil gaymuth you'd prolly ask for an autograph and poker wisdom.u're the opposite of the most interesting man in the world. u prolly think u ran bad... for the last 25 years.

Last edited by Olaff; 12-20-2016 at 05:02 AM.
Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz? Quote
12-20-2016 , 05:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by acescracked84
To be fair, Olaff is right. Neither one of these two could beat any legitimate form of poker. Not even 2/5 NL live. Cate Hall in particular looks trashy and couldn't beat any live cash game. Just goes to show how big of a joke tournaments are.
how the **** are these 2 even "pros"? what a mockery of the game.
Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz? Quote
12-20-2016 , 05:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DontBanMePlz
crazy lying cate said she sold action for the wsop womens 1k when i offered to short her at a steep price, she got better markup from her investors. Also a huge difference between playing a $5k on your own dime and playing multiple $50k hu matches. My statement still stands, don't think there is a doubt she would have a fraction of her own action if they did play $50k matches.

funny she blocks me but still trys to interact. its pretty pathetic to try to shame mike for not wanting to play hu $50k matches where mike probably hasn't played more than 10k hands of headsup life time. If she were down for a real challenge though I would play $50k matches and give her some odds although I have a feeling her backers who would have 90%+ of her action vs. mike would not want to invest in that.
what legit pro gets backed for CASH? unless it's super nose bleeds. pathetic.
Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz? Quote
12-20-2016 , 05:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dream Crusher
All of these online guys must really hate money to continue to grind for peanuts online when the potential earnings are way higher live. After black friday a lot of online guys completely disappeared. Either they really hated money or simply discovered it would be more profitable for them to grind Mickey Ds.
wrong. im sorry u dont c them in your drunken 1/2 but there are plenty in high stakes cash. the higher u go the more of them u c.
Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz? Quote

      
m