Quote:
Stories that are quite the opposite such as many covered on 60 minutes, 20/20 etc... appeal to mass audiences as well.
Hopefully Ben realizes that a positive spin book full of miinformation is not a smart marketing move. If he tells the whole story from beginning to end he can include the frat to online poker room stuff as well as the cheating and still appeal to a mass audience.
Au contraire. Ben Mizrach is much more savvy and astute as to what works (and what doesn't work) when it comes to marketing a book in which Hollywood might take an interest. Ben knows that controversy, especially heated controversy, sells books. If he portrays Scott Tom and his frat boy friends as counterculture "heroes" who scored big while essentially ignoring the dark side of their shenanigans, that kind of book will generate a lot of controversy - and sell a lot of books. Of course, Ben could write a more even handed treatment that tells both sides (good and bad) but that kind of book doesn't exactly fit in with his tried and true formula. Ben has a formula which he sticks to - a "formula" which features smart young college kids showing up establishment types - and getting super rich in the process. Telling the true story of what went on at AP/UB doesn't fit in with his formula. (Not to mention the fact that Hollywood would probably not be interested in a routine ho-hum story about thieves and crooks cheating nerdy poker players. That kind of story is more in line with CNBC's "American Greed" series.)
I suspect Ben will choose not to break with his tried and true formula - he'll portray Scott Tom and his buddies as heroes - and laugh all the way to the bank as he deposits royalty checks and sells the movie rights to Hollywood for a minor fortune. Hey, that formula has already worked twice, why should he think it won't work a third time?
EDIT: My goof. When I began writing this, I did not notice that the OP in this thread was posted over a year ago - despite the fact that I posted a reply! I watched the Squawk Box interview and thought Ben had appeared on the program this morning. Oh well, most of what I wrote (above) still stands.
Last edited by Alan C. Lawhon; 05-23-2013 at 11:32 PM.
Reason: Minor edit. Added a post script.