swigggsssss,
Online poker is so "dorky" you're def right. All those dorks with their HUDs and all that, geez, are they stupid?

What were the final totals after the 3 matches?

Ivey $164K+

too bad they cant multitable this stake lol

if someone pays player points for a 1k/2k nl level or whatever, will ftp make one for them?

Just in case this is not a level...there was a hand posted here I think where Genius called 25 k on the turn once with ajos high, with his only chance to win being a 2 I think it was and got there with the low straight beating Ivey's trip. Bad play from Genius while running hot then busted him soon after etc?

There's no way anyone can say Genius or Ivey is by far superior based on the hands posted in this thread. Silly speculative not enough samples etc.

He's playing durrrr now 100/200 HA

everyone is such dorks duh

For that J4 OOP argument guy

Full Tilt Poker $100.00/$200.00 Pot Limit Hold'em - 2 players
The Official 2+2 Hand Converter Powered By DeucesCracked.com

durrrr (BTN/SB): $19800.00
Phil Ivey (BB): $16598.50

Pre Flop:
durrrr raises to $600, Phil Ivey calls $400

Flop: ($1200.00) 3 3 4 (2 players)
Phil Ivey checks, durrrr bets $850, Phil Ivey raises to $2200, durrrr raises to $5750, Phil Ivey raises to $15998.50 all in, durrrr calls $10248.50

Turn: ($33197.00) Q

River: ($33197.00) 2

Final Pot: $33197.00
durrrr shows 5d 5c (two pair, Fives and Threes)
Phil Ivey shows Kd 3c (three of a kind, Threes)
Phil Ivey wins $33196.50
(Rake: $0.50)

95% of the players are losers to the game. lots of people use those online tools and still cant make a go of it so they must be stupid or they have character flaws.

just like you i'm sure. "ever suck dick for marijuanna"?

i'd pull that statement down before i make dumb comments, dork.

most of you guys suck at poker one way or the other. i'm sure you all know how to play but some where along the way, you destroy yourselves or your just not that good.

only 5% are winners. so 95% of the people in here are in some serious delusional denial. but keep up the witty comments. too bad there isnt profit in it or half you dorks would be millionaires.

i dunno why live players feel the need to whine when we point out that a monkey could win at live (and they do), and those same live players couldnt beat micro stakes online...

95% of the total amount of people who play poker are longterm losers not 95% of the people who are members of two plus two. GG simple logic.

sqwiss or whatever the **** your name is--

its good that you can beat 10/20 live, because that means that you will probably make it to at least 1/2 online before you go busto (provided you run pretty well)

i knew you were going to say that. ok, thats fair.

90% of the dorks in here are long term losers.

i know the struggle of making a profit year in and year out. it takes a lot of mental strength and a good pain threshold. most of you dorks get your shorts in a knot over threads like mine. if that bothers you, then i dont see how more than 10% in here can be winners.

i also think that online players dont know the sting of running bad for a month "live". online, i can play 4 tables at once. a 1 month bad streak live is the equivalent of a few days 4 tabling online........and most still cant handle it.

naw, no way do i believe most people in here have the mental fortitude for the abuse poker can dish out. you dorks might have some college learning and can crunch numbers but all the poker tracker and degrees cant keep you from tilting away your money and giving up.

i'll agree that there is a higher percentage that can win but they dont. its not about playing winning poker. lots of people can do that. but to build profit year in and year out is totally another story.........with 90% sad stories in here. but most of you would never admit it......another character flaw.

care to bet on that big mouth? i have already offered this bet to anyone in the plo section.

i make it to 10k with no time limits. i'll bet with anyone up to 5k. offer some realistic arrangements for the money and we have a bet.

anytime.

i dont need to run hot to reach that mark. i dont need poker tracker or rake back.

beating online is easy. its not rocket science.

losing 8-10 buy ins in 2 hours of HU play stings. Just because the recovery is quicker doesn't mean the downswing hurts any less.

lolwtf

it's easy because it's not rocket science?

a lot of non-easy things aren't rocket science.

If your argument is correct that everyone here is a poker tracking dork who will give up as soon as they hit a downswing I have to wonder why this place is not empty

Fair enough you don't want to fork out $55 for pokertacker. It's not essential to beat poker.

But to simply disregard rakeback when trying to move up through the limits as you claim to be doing so, is what your everyday fool would do. The only reason I can think of why you don't have rakeback is not because you want to challenge yourself further but because you clearly didn't do your homework and research what bonuses were available when signing up to the site that you play on.

Just accept that you come across as semi-******ed in this thread.

sqwiss...if u think its tough running bad live for a month try running bad online for amonth when u run bad for 10x as many hands

because they come back. poker is addictive. they come back with the best intentions of "not blowing up this time". but most still do.

i myself have quit poker a few times in the past. had my tilt issues too but i eliminated it. its not easy but with desire and self analysis and brutal honesty, it can be over come.

i dont give a **** about how i come off. you guys are beating a dead horse.

true, i am disgruntled about not having rakeback. i signed up without knowing what the hell it is but i have integrity, not like some of the *******s in here with multi accounts. i wont resort to that. i missed out on rakeback and i have to live with it. i also didnt utilize the 600 bonus because i had my money transfered.

whatever, i dont need those things to reach my imediate goals. i just play.

you can't have money transferred unless you have made a deposit. if you make a deposit you automatically have some sort of bonus.

i dont believe that. your in denial. there is bad play mixed in with your 1 month online bad streak. its astronomically not realistic to 4 table for 1 month and run bad.

besides, its the bad streaks that i embrace because its how you play through them is where the true profit lies. you all should learn to embrace it too. but i admit also that those bad streaks make me physically tired but i play through them very well. most people cant.

but not if the money is transferred. no bonus.

maybe its because i signed up once back in 2001. they are using my old info i guess. idk. i dont care. i must have made a small deposit to play some donkaments back in the days of netteller. all i know is i dont have rake back or a bonus. i have tried to get rake back but fulltilt wont give it to me. whatever, it doesnt matter.