Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
White supremacist radicalization via popular discourse and the El Paso Shooter White supremacist radicalization via popular discourse and the El Paso Shooter

08-05-2019 , 02:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luckbox Inc
Whenever I was growing up, before white-supremacism and fascism and Trump ever became a thing--that is always how we considered fascism.
I had a friend who hung himself--one of my gutter-punk punk rock friends--who used to get **** faced drunk and be reduced mentally to where the only thing he could say was "****ing fascists". Once when some gang of 15 year olds tried to mug me and I ran from them I got back to the house and told Wally about it and he was like "why? Because you're black? Let's get them". And I tried to talk him out of it and after he insisted on going out on his own armed with only a skateboard, I had to drive him around to look for them. But he hated fascists and the fascists were the people trying to kick him out of bars and in general restrict freedom. And I'll always have a fondness for that definition because of my friend and it is sad that you can't really use it like that anymore.
But as to your post, it's the fascists that want to restrict speech and use the leverage of the state and big institutions to go after individuals.
I do not know if it's fascism, per se. It's the ends justify the means type thing. I do not know if they know they are doing it, or if it's actually a cognitive issue where they believe in the righteousness, that they ignore the bad things that occur using the tactics they use. And it's not just a left-wing thing, the right is just as bad.
White supremacist radicalization via popular discourse and the El Paso Shooter Quote
08-05-2019 , 03:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelhus999
It is not the "right-winger" part that is concerning per se. I just chose that example because it allegedly happened (her and other right wing figures claim they have lost their banking accounts at Chase for ideological reasons and this kind of stuff makes the rounds on right wing media; although it is hard to verify because Chase and the MSM are refusing to comment on it one way or another).

The way our economy works, cutting someone off from banks and credit processing is effectively shutting them out of society, and I dont think any private business should have that power unchecked, especially for speech.

-Below is a right wing site making claims of right wing figures getting their accounts frozen for political reasons. Again, hard to verify because Chase itself and the MSM are mum on the subject.
https://www.dailysignal.com/2019/04/...d-by-politics/
Everyone should have access to banking services and access to the internet (among other thing). These things are just too important to life.

But that doesn't mean that sites/companies have a right to these things. Nor does it mean that individuals have the right to use any old banking service or allowed to participate on any particular site. There may be special cases and some monopolistic sites that are so important that access restrictions should be a matter for the courts.

In passing. I'm totally on board with the below but very much doubt I'm going to be welcomed as a comrade.
Quote:
I mean, if you want to fight for gay people getting protection from being fired for being gay, or to protect workers from being fired if they start talking about unionizing, welcome to the team, comrade. If the battle you want to fight is for a website that radicalizes white supremacists to violence, **** off.
White supremacist radicalization via popular discourse and the El Paso Shooter Quote
08-05-2019 , 03:20 PM
I doubt Chase even closed Laura Loomer's account and if they did it was almost certainly for something other than speech.

If banking in general became difficult because of speech, I would probably support a law. One bank may be private, but on the whole banking is quasi-public.
White supremacist radicalization via popular discourse and the El Paso Shooter Quote
08-05-2019 , 04:59 PM
Eddie Glaude weighing in, as he so often expertly does:

White supremacist radicalization via popular discourse and the El Paso Shooter Quote
08-05-2019 , 05:03 PM
A youtube channel with 3 subs and 8 views is pretty impressive.
But I'm still trying to figure out what I'm watching.
Catch the super creepy smile when he says "America is not unique in its sins" right in the beginning.

Last edited by Luckbox Inc; 08-05-2019 at 05:11 PM.
White supremacist radicalization via popular discourse and the El Paso Shooter Quote
08-05-2019 , 06:58 PM
These issues are incredibly complicated but I think the main ingredients are polarization leading to radicalization. This is being exaggerated by isolation and online echo chambers. Then you add the nihilism and increased factors leading to suicidal tendencies. Social media amplifying all of this. All of this combined and easy access to highly efficient tools for killing...
White supremacist radicalization via popular discourse and the El Paso Shooter Quote
08-05-2019 , 08:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Cut
Tucker Carlson should be in jail, and other right-wing for-profit fear-mongering violence-inciting propagandists parading as journalists.
Sorry for the derail into free speech/press on this thread, but do you actually believe this? Or it was hyperbole?

It scares me to see such statements, and I think is the way leftists (fascist left, as opposed to liberal progressives) actually think. My questions above are real questions though, not rhetorical, because I am hoping I'm overreacting.
White supremacist radicalization via popular discourse and the El Paso Shooter Quote
08-05-2019 , 09:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pokerodox
Sorry for the derail into free speech/press on this thread, but do you actually believe this? Or it was hyperbole?

It scares me to see such statements, and I think is the way leftists (fascist left, as opposed to liberal progressives) actually think. My questions above are real questions though, not rhetorical, because I am hoping I'm overreacting.
There should be consequences for what they do under the guise of journalism. Free speech/press my ass. If damages could be objectively measured, they would be removed from society. I haven't thought deeply enough about it to answer your question thoughtfully, but I will offer that I believe they are more deserving of incarceration than a non-trivial percentage of current inmates.
White supremacist radicalization via popular discourse and the El Paso Shooter Quote
08-05-2019 , 09:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huehuecoyotl
I think when I call someone racist, they take a moment of self reflection and ask themselves, "Why would someone call me racist?" and then start a dialog to explore their actions and get to know themselves and others more. I'm an optimist.
Different posters get different mileage out of their accusations
White supremacist radicalization via popular discourse and the El Paso Shooter Quote
08-05-2019 , 09:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Cut
There should be consequences for what they do under the guise of journalism. Free speech/press my ass. If damages could be objectively measured, they would be removed from society. I haven't thought deeply enough about it to answer your question thoughtfully, but I will offer that I believe they are more deserving of incarceration than a non-trivial percentage of current inmates.
That can be said of basically any political position.

I'll take an example. Let's say minimum wage laws are better for society than their absence. Let's say you can calculate the damage of not having minimum wage laws. Should a talking head who advocates for not having minimum wage laws go to jail for arguing against minimum wage laws? Clearly not. At least I hope it's clear.

Now switch to Carlson saying stuff about immigration. I don't watch Fox News, though I may have seen Carlson 3 or 4 times. What did he actually say that makes you want to put him in jail?

Let's leave aside your view that some drug criminals (or whatever criminals) shouldn't be in jail. Not relevant.

Sorry if I'm blowing this out of proportion, but your view on this is actually pretty scary to me, and, I suspect, it's common on the far left.
White supremacist radicalization via popular discourse and the El Paso Shooter Quote
08-05-2019 , 09:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pokerodox
Sorry for the derail into free speech/press on this thread, but do you actually believe this? Or it was hyperbole?

It scares me to see such statements, and I think is the way leftists (fascist left, as opposed to liberal progressives) actually think. My questions above are real questions though, not rhetorical, because I am hoping I'm overreacting.
Did you miss the thread dedicated to Carlson in the old forum? They legitimately weighed the pros and cons of burning his house down after antifa terrified his wife and kid
Quote:
Originally Posted by coordi
Different posters get different mileage out of their accusations
Yeah I think the problem is that people feel the need to defend themselves against those accusations and it just ends to a constant derail. But the actual perception of the accusation looks something like this. Warning, he uses the F--K word
White supremacist radicalization via popular discourse and the El Paso Shooter Quote
08-05-2019 , 09:42 PM
Shooter seems like a confused loner who spent a lot of times in dark corners of the internet. Seems pretty unlikely he was an innocent soul lured into radical trappings through normal societal means. He probably grew up around a bunch of racists, was of poor social adjustment, and sought further like minded individuals through the magic of the internets.

I feel like the ever increasing left leaning demographic of the old politard forum might be some sort of case study for the phenomenon of the near omniscience of the internet leading to more and more narrow views as it allows for even the niche-est of belief to find community and tribalize.

Edit: Fair point Clovis. And since you called me out, I'll edit it out to be less inflammatory.

Last edited by coordi; 08-05-2019 at 09:57 PM. Reason: removed "far" before left
White supremacist radicalization via popular discourse and the El Paso Shooter Quote
08-05-2019 , 09:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by coordi
Shooter seems like a confused loner who spent a lot of times in dark corners of the internet. Seems pretty unlikely he was an innocent soul lured into radical trappings through normal societal means. He probably grew up around a bunch of racists, was of poor social adjustment, and sought further like minded individuals through the magic of the internets.

I feel like the ever increasing far left leaning demographic of the old politard forum might be some sort of case study for the phenomenon of the near omniscience of the internet leading to more and more narrow views as it allows for even the niche-est of belief to find community and tribalize.
You don’t know what far left means.
White supremacist radicalization via popular discourse and the El Paso Shooter Quote
08-05-2019 , 10:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pokerodox
That can be said of basically any political position.

I'll take an example. Let's say minimum wage laws are better for society than their absence. Let's say you can calculate the damage of not having minimum wage laws. Should a talking head who advocates for not having minimum wage laws go to jail for arguing against minimum wage laws? Clearly not. At least I hope it's clear.

Now switch to Carlson saying stuff about immigration. I don't watch Fox News, though I may have seen Carlson 3 or 4 times. What did he actually say that makes you want to put him in jail?

Let's leave aside your view that some drug criminals (or whatever criminals) shouldn't be in jail. Not relevant.

Sorry if I'm blowing this out of proportion, but your view on this is actually pretty scary to me, and, I suspect, it's common on the far left.
Assuming your premise about min-wage, it's actually not clear and it would depend on the amount of damage. Remember, this is a hypothetical where we know the amount of damage.

It's Carlson's body of work, amplified by others that does the damage. Don't expect me to pick out statements that alone rise to that level. I'm sure there are examples to make my point, such as unfair inflammatory criticism of Rep. Omar, Ocasio Cortez, and others that could put them at increased personal risk, but mostly it's the steady drum beat of white nationalism, directly or by dog whistle.

My statement did not say I thought some criminals should not be in jail (although I do believe that), it was that Carlson and others are more deserving of incarceration than some convicts. It's relevant to your original question (do I believe Carlson should be put in jail) because my answer would depend somewhat on what society chooses to do with criminals - since we have an affinity for locking people up, Carlson et al make the cut in my opinion (pending deeper consideration.)

I do not consider Carlson a journalist.

edit: I meant to include something about you thinking it's a common opinion on the left. That would surprise me.

Last edited by Max Cut; 08-05-2019 at 11:22 PM.
White supremacist radicalization via popular discourse and the El Paso Shooter Quote
08-05-2019 , 11:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by juan valdez
Did you miss the thread dedicated to Carlson in the old forum? They legitimately weighed the pros and cons of burning his house down after antifa terrified his wife and kid
this misrepresents the facts
White supremacist radicalization via popular discourse and the El Paso Shooter Quote
08-05-2019 , 11:15 PM
Quote:
Experts say that the similarities are far from a coincidence. White nationalist terrorism is following a progression eerily similar to that of jihadism under the leadership of the Islamic State, in ways that do much to explain why the attacks have suddenly grown so frequent and deadly.

In both, there is the apocalyptic ideology that predicts — and promises to hasten — a civilizational conflict that will consume the world. There is theatrical, indiscriminate violence that will supposedly bring about this final battle, but often does little more than grant the killer a brief flash of empowerment and win attention for the cause.
https://nyti.ms/2yE8ZPa
White supremacist radicalization via popular discourse and the El Paso Shooter Quote
08-06-2019 , 12:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luckbox Inc
I appreciate that that is the origin of the term. THAT IS WHAT I'VE BEEN SAYING.
My observation (because it isn't really a point yet and might never become one) is that the term has changed now (or within the last couple of years) to mean this new strain of rightwing supremacism/segregation/genocide.
That is the part that shouldn't be hard for you, but first you told me I'm confusing the term and after I've shown that to be wrong you're arguing nothing back at me and telling me it isn't hard.
And I'm saying it's also always meant that.

Like, you know how dictionaries have multiple definitions of a word, listed by relevance? Or are dictionaries just for sheeple living in the fever dream matrix?
White supremacist radicalization via popular discourse and the El Paso Shooter Quote
08-06-2019 , 12:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luckbox Inc
Whenever I was growing up, before white-supremacism and fascism and Trump ever became a thing--that is always how we considered fascism.

....
wait















wait
White supremacist radicalization via popular discourse and the El Paso Shooter Quote
08-06-2019 , 12:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by juan valdez
Did you miss the thread dedicated to Carlson in the old forum? They legitimately weighed the pros and cons of burning his house down after antifa terrified his wife and kid

Yeah I think the problem is that people feel the need to defend themselves against those accusations and it just ends to a constant derail. But the actual perception of the accusation looks something like this. Warning, he uses the F--K word
Part of the problem is that you are a legit liar. Like your entire post is just straight up lies.

Last edited by well named; 08-06-2019 at 08:52 AM.
White supremacist radicalization via popular discourse and the El Paso Shooter Quote
08-06-2019 , 12:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6ix
And I'm saying it's also always meant that.



Like, you know how dictionaries have multiple definitions of a word, listed by relevance? Or are dictionaries just for sheeple living in the fever dream matrix?
Ok. I've read about it. I still think the treatment of it all is interesting but I'll let it go until someone writes another article.
White supremacist radicalization via popular discourse and the El Paso Shooter Quote
08-06-2019 , 12:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by coordi
Shooter seems like a confused loner who spent a lot of times in dark corners of the internet. Seems pretty unlikely he was an innocent soul lured into radical trappings through normal societal means. He probably grew up around a bunch of racists, was of poor social adjustment, and sought further like minded individuals through the magic of the internets.

I feel like the ever increasing left leaning demographic of the old politard forum might be some sort of case study for the phenomenon of the near omniscience of the internet leading to more and more narrow views as it allows for even the niche-est of belief to find community and tribalize.

Edit: Fair point Clovis. And since you called me out, I'll edit it out to be less inflammatory.
Bro as much as you wish the old politics forum regs were shooting up whatever, sorry it's not the case. The reality is that white supremacists radicalized by 8chan or whatever or shooting up mosques and churches and Mexicans on a weekly basis.

It's not the ppl advocating for healthcare and equal rights no matter how much you wishcast.

Last edited by well named; 08-06-2019 at 08:52 AM.
White supremacist radicalization via popular discourse and the El Paso Shooter Quote
08-06-2019 , 01:02 AM
Bro, my post was about how the old politics forum ended up almost exclusively a certain brand of Dem, and how that relates to the broader internet as a whole. You legitimately can't read. Or maybe you are drunk?

I dunno, I expect an apology when you come to your senses though.
White supremacist radicalization via popular discourse and the El Paso Shooter Quote
08-06-2019 , 01:06 AM
Like dude posts a manifesto spelling out exactly why he's gonna commit mass murder and Coordi is like ya I'm gonna blame the guys supporting health care and equality. I can't even. I'm just speechless. I wish I was smart enough to say something witty but nope. Just legit sad that I share the planet with him.
White supremacist radicalization via popular discourse and the El Paso Shooter Quote
08-06-2019 , 01:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor
Like dude posts a manifesto spelling out exactly why he's gonna commit mass murder and Coordi is like ya I'm gonna blame the guys supporting health care and equality. I can't even. I'm just speechless. I wish I was smart enough to say something witty but nope. Just legit sad that I share the planet with him.
Curious, were you one of the lefties mocking "they hate us for our freedoms", despite that being one Al Qaeda's primary reasoning for 9/11? The social invasion of western liberal ideals into Islamic lands corrupting Muslims... That was rejected by many on the left, rightly so.
White supremacist radicalization via popular discourse and the El Paso Shooter Quote
08-06-2019 , 01:16 AM
I blame the environment the kid grew up in over anything else. I don't think this forum or people who support health care abroad are to blame in any way.

Something Chez said in another thread stuck with me a bit. The gist was; if you are saying things and everyone can't understand you, then the problem is you.

Which is why I haven't been posting much. I say one thing, someone responds as if I said another. And it just happens over and over to the point that I must be crazy or deficient or something.

I have no clue how you could interpret my comment as blaming the old forum.
White supremacist radicalization via popular discourse and the El Paso Shooter Quote

      
m