scientific community, if you step out of line too much youre banned, which means toast, no more income. Its wise of them to shut up.

and thats what we know about. mach 6.70

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_H2he0UUXW4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DG6USXbTsW0

As a wannabe professional debunker, LOL.

Have you any idea how many physicists, engineers etc. there are across the world? You think they're all at risk of being "banned" from science if they say "Hey, we've seen footage of something that demonstrably defies our understanding of physics"? Is that really the line you want to take here?

What happens if you hit Warp 10?

min 5.33 'didnt match any known aircraft' on the westcoast

timetravel?

Your mocking dismissals do not hide your lack of substance.

It is you rhetorical reply when you have no answer but want to pretend you do.

You Blue Book talk as comparable and laughable because unlike today that talk only literally identified 'Unidentified' flying objects and nothing more.

When asked what more todays talk exposed, you refuse to answer.

That is because you cannot. You FEEL it was something more but you just cannot explain what that is.

But anyway, it is not like you are not exposed and everyone dealing with you does not know who you are.

As a wannabe professional debunker, I would guess that many scientists could answer this but won't because they'll be banned from science.

Banned = toast

Lol. You tried to argue to argue that all this UFO stuff popped up organically because people see UFOs. It's a complete joke and deserved a mocking response.

Remember previously you argued it was a result of a change in policy to now allow for the government to tell the truth.

I think we should acknowledge that a wannabe professional debunker made some predictions about the report in this thread and they were spot on. Can you remind us what you thought the report would either contain or what consequences would follow from it?

If you want to find and quote posts you should do that.

Here you go, 100s of wronged scientists and vice versa here, science that was proven wrong.
https://www.technologynetworks.com/t...ir-time-277692
https://www.medicaldaily.com/mad-sci...s-later-362010
https://www.famousscientists.org/7-s...eir-lifetimes/
https://www.wired.com/2012/06/famous...ed-scientists/
https://www.insider.com/inventions-t...6-8#vaccines-7
https://azchemistry.com/scientists-w...or-their-ideas
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/...sults-mistakes
https://psmag.com/education/scientists-are-wrong-a-lot
https://www.discovermagazine.com/the...-last-20-years
https://www.famousscientists.org/10-...ater-debunked/
https://www.newyorker.com/humor/dail...proved-by-2020
https://theconversation.com/the-misl...-decades-95737

No. You are just resorting to lies now as you always do.

You made a assertion and you made it as if an obvious one.

That assertion was to mock the idea that prior Blue Book disclosures were not like what was happening today as that was just the 'literal' saying of 'we see Unidentified Flying Objects' and nothing more substantive than that. 'Things we see but cannot explain'.

That was your hand waving dismissal of why it is not the same as today.


I then ASKED a QUESTION of you. I asked you what you see in todays examples that are more than that if you are going to stand by that claim.

It is still a valid question. It is also one I would bet every dollar you will NEVER attempt to answer and instead pretend the question is absurd as you have no answer.

But I leave it open for you to answer or to expose yourself further on.

I did that when the thread reopened and then again for you yesterday.

So, as a wannabe professional debunker, I'm in this situation where my predictions are so far correct and we still have no idea what your position even was.

That's why I assume this thread was reopened after my request for a wannabe professional victory dance.

Nobody's going to read through your spamming of links that you yet again haven't summarised even a single example from. As a wannabe professional debunker I'm not wasting my time on that.

You've spent all this time with me in this thread and you don't know what my position is?

Your position is that something different is happening in some way with the odds being something that something may be released that may or may not change the needle.

Nobody knows any of the specifics behind this spooky psy op of yours, since you refuse to go into the details, but credit to you to find all these psy ops that few others can see. Additionally, congrats that the sinister minds behind the psy ops have yet to figure out a way to evade your gifted detection.

Well, okay, that was slightly hyperbolic. I know that your position is that something is different about UFOs in the news. And that the report was going to somehow be related to something. But what that something is and how it's different or what it's different to is a total mystery.

It's this kind of error that's why I'm still just a wannabe professional debunker.

yes, and it is suspicious when these sources get platforms on 60 minutes, etc. where they are not rebutted but rather presented as something we all need to take very seriously

Yes but he has clearly re-iterated over and over that very unclear position thus making it clear via re-iteration.

It is exactly what Alex Jones does and complains that Trump Derps do wrong. Just assert over and over 'something is up' but stay away from ALL specifics that you could ever be called upon. Repeat same over and over as if the repetition is the substantiation.

(obviously you know this but Lucky needs to know that every individual sees his BS for what it is. He is an empty shell on this topic)

You don’t communicate terribly well.

I dunno, as a wannabe professional debunker, that's exactly what I expect. People generally like cool stories about the "what if" much more than they like a dry analysis of how a video shows nothing interesting.

That is by design.

Lucky : The Blue Book stuff does not compare to what is being disclosed today. It was only a literal acknowledgement back then of unidentified objects being seen unlike what is happening and being disclosed today.

Also Lucky : NO, I will not in any way clarify what the differences are today that I am stating exist in my prior post, and instead will laugh at anyone questioning what is different as if that is not a 'understood' by all.

Also, also Lucky : Haha after all this time you don't know what my position is on why the Blue Book situation was different??


The Statement IS the proof just as Alex Jones says and you stay away from any specifics or clarifications that expose you as wrong.

ok, you are attempting to explain why the story was aired, to "give the people what they want". so sitting government officials like marco rubio go on there to blather on about it because people like cool stories?

people do like cool stories, which is what "unsolved mysteries" and the "x-files" were for. is there a long list of 60 minutes episodes in the past im not aware of where the message was we need to take ufos very seriously?