Quote:
Originally Posted by Cuepee
Good points and I would say that certainly has been true at times.
Engaging in peace talks can often be used as a way to buy time, re-organize and attack with a renewed effort, especially when on the back foot as Russia is now.
That said I think Russia would be happy to engage in such talks right now and get resolution and peace if Ukraine would agree. HOwever I think the terms would be so out there that Ukraine would never agree (Russia to keep all claimed territory including the recent ones with the fake referendums) and Russia would know that going in to the talks. BUt if they can get Ukraine to stop these advancements and gains before winter sets in, and those gains become locked, then by all means 'lets do peace talks' before the expected renewed Russian spring offensive.
They will of course set terms for engaging in peace talks that they would abuse to strengthen positions in Ukraine. The playbook will be to demand a cessation of hostilities in order to sit down for talks. They would abuse this to strengthen their positions in Ukraine, secure supply lines and bring material to the front. Whenever it benefits them, they would violate the cessation of hostilities and lie about it.
The Russian regime is looking for a win. They invaded Ukraine after lying about their intentions, and at every step of the way when they had opportunity to pull back, they have instead escalated their efforts.
There is nothing wrong with wanting peace, but you do not get peace by being naive.
