Actually, it can make a huge difference to a company (and shareholders) who they hire as new CEO. Not sure why you think that analogy helps your case. I also find this a weird claim because you do claim that a $15 minimum wage is real change, but not the presidency. The chances of that happening are impacted more by whether Warren or Trump win the presidency than anything else over the next few years imo.

Why did hunter bidens legal team contact ukraines new prosecutor the day he was replaced....???

John Solomon is a liar and working with qanon. Let's see what the documents have to say. But of course now that the Ukrainians have been strong armed there isn't a reason to trust them anyways. Sorry.

uhhh, you were defending john solomon a few weeks ago.. what changed lol??

Thinking about this, gives Adam Schiff total legal right to ask for Rudy Guiliani's calendar.

Did he meet with other porn stars?

Other foreign governments?

Can the White House hide behind executive privilege?

This is a big problem for Trump.

Guessing, they will release his calendar only as it relates to the Ukraine, but Schiff won't accept such an answer.

Was it you Luckbox that posted a story from the Hill and I showed you the wiki the reporter and his story of getting hired at the Hill, getting caught reporting a lot of Republican made up stuff as straight fact and then getting moved over the opinion side so his hack jobs don't count as reporting any more?

In any case I'll let you guess the guy's last name

I don't believe it was me. Was it Solomon though?

Was I? I don't believe so. I recall other people trashing him but I think I stayed out of it. I don't defend any journalists except Matt Taibbi and only then barely.
I can defend a story if I think some journalist has gotten the details right but I don't know what story that would have been.
But Solomon and his pal Sara Carter seem to be the main mouthpieces for the administration.
But my point isn't whether any of this from him is true or not. It's that none of the so-called liberals will care if it is or isn't because Solomon's credibility with them is shot.

What I said about Solomon. Apparently he did fudge some stuff about the texts between Strozk and Page--when they come off like regular partisans and not secret anti-Trump deepstaters.

this is a hannity piece right? lol

why did the current ukranian prosecutor general say there was no truth to that, and that the investigation had already cleared biden and son of any wrongdoing, AND that there was no active investigation into the Burisma company during the time that Shokin is alleging that he was interested in biden's son.

Here is what I said about Solomon in that thread and it still applies here. So when Solomon says he has a bunch of documents then I believe he does--but we can't be positive that he is reporting on them accurately unfortunately. Probably he will be and probably what he has is awful for Biden but partisans won't care.

I'm a partisan and I care. If there is real evidence of Biden doing something wrong here, I want it to become public as soon as possible. Much better now than next September when/if he's already the nominee. Solomon is a partisan reporter, but I have more respect for Republicans who do actual reporting than those just go on Fox News and moan about media bias and fake news.

Solomon isn't doing real reporting. He is just fed information the same way almost all of them are fed information. I.e., he's an apparatus of the state.

He worked at AP for almost twenty years and worked as an investigative reporter for WaPo, so he has certainly done real reporting. Maybe today he's doing something different, I don't know.

all we know original position is that this prosecutor was investigating many things, including the company Biden's son worked for.

Most of Europe wanted him removed.

Biden, probably with Obama's backing, was the front man to get him removed.

Did Biden have a conflict? Most likely. Was it under the Obama's Adminstration interest to have him removed anyway? Most likely.

Is it in Trump's interest to find out what he was investigating against EU interests, Obama foreign policy goals and Hunter Biden? Most likely.

Bullshit. You keep subtlely changing details to fit your argument. Blasey-Ford accusation was to thwart a political nominee, not to investigate Kavanagh for rape (that was her entire goal), the D's turned that accusation into an FBI investigation.

I'm not saying "any type". The investigation based on the accusation was to thwart a political appointee, for political purposes. You can claim it's standard for politicians to demand criminal investigations by the FBI, based on nothing more than accusations, but that's not how it works. One, that type of thing is handled by local jurisdiction, not the FBI. The D's requested the investigation, not some complaint made by the purported victim. The entire thing was a politically motivated investigation, which is why you don't like what Trump did, but do not have a problem with what the D's did for a SCOTUS nominee, and pretend I'm the one with the logic fail, after you ignore some salient similarities. If you were serious about wanting the rape investigated, you would of wanted the D's to do it right, and have the local authorities investigate it, and not have the FBI try and dig up dirt on a opposing political appointee, for political purposes.

Who the **** goes to congress to have a rape investigated? A lefty who does not want a pro life judge appointed. If she was concerned about the rape being investigated, she would of went to the local authorities, not the media, and damn sure not congress. Spare me the lack of concern for rape victims argument. It's not applicable when Blasey Ford herself has only used it for political purposes.

Which reporters are?

Idk. Real stories get killed or not picked up. Probably some local ones someone covering local things if they haven't yet been blackballed by their local PD and mayor's office.

Such as?

Taibbi talks about some involving the tobacco industry, Chiquita Banana, and Monsanto
https://taibbi.substack.com/p/chapte...e-ten-rules-of
I'd add Gary Webb's San Jose Mercury News coverage of the CIA/cocaine connection to the list and I'm sure there are plenty of other examples. Reporters are supposed to make enemies not friends. [And those who get stories fed to them don't make enemies]
What's with the question game today Trolly? Bored?

You go to Congress when the guy that raped you is about to be appointed to the Supreme Court and Congress is vetting him. Lol, but whatever you gotta tell yourself so that you don’t feel bad about supporting and enabling flagrant sexual abusers.

There is less evidence Kavanaugh raped someone than there is of Biden having a conflict of interest...who, you know, is running for POTUS, but you are confident in calling Kavanaugh a rapist, but want to say "nothing to see here" with Biden. Right.

I'm not the one rationalizing one politically motivated investigation and damning another.

.

What till Amy Barret is on the court next.

Kavanaugh was appointed to beat roe vs. wade.

Amy Barret going to take it to the next level.

Saving her for Ginsburgs seat.

So, to be clear, you think 60 Minutes is a Real News outlet and their reporting on the tobacco industry is Real News? I would agree with that statement, FWIW. Now I'm in the mood to re-watch The Insider.

Again, I have to question what you're doing here if you think these incredibly simple questions are out of line. Like, what do you imagine goes on in a politics forum?

Think Kavanaugh, or Gorsuch is bad on Roe Vs. Wade?

Amy Barret is the next appointment.