If he's lying to get himself re-elected, then that's in the national interest. You must have missed the memo!

This is by far...and i mean by FARRRRRR...like really really really far...like Space X far...and even farther then that...the most insane stupidist post ive ever seen on the internet.

Ok dumb-dumb, explain why it is the supidist? Perhaps you are unaware of the fact that jobs exist which require people to put their personal biases aside?

Garbage strawman post.

This is not about YOU or I doing it. THis is about the Private Company Twitter, acting within the Free Market, controlling the rules of their company.

You are arguing 'no, Trump and the Gov't and CHina should control those rules'.

Aka climate changes and plenty others .
It simple, republicans ( well principally tea party but republicans seem to be unable to diverge from them ..) based their decisions on opinions not facts .
For them facts is an opinion .
They can’t differentiate the two for multiple reasons .

Even if you don't see it yourself. You are not neutral. You are leaning on the very end of the polital spectrum. The right end. So far off the middle that it makes me worry. Your view is clouded. And he is right.
You are def not being neutral.

And the fact that you don't see it is really concerning.
You are not able for a proper self assessment.

I give you an example because I don't like bullying and people making fun at others collectively.

You are keeping putting gas in the fire constantly by not being knowledgeable about certain topics.

In your thread you are saying that cnn is biased vs trump.
Hope you see that he is lying constantly and making an idiot of himself.

For example: Cops

Let's add more professions to our society that give out huge power and can cause awful results if those wielders are biased, what could go wrong

Stop it, please.


Can u please respond to this post!?
(this entails exactly what i was trying to say)
So if u wanna outsmart me, this is your chance!
Anyway, its what ''The Don'' was stating...cant see how u can crawl out of this one.

Originally Posted by THAY3R View Post
Not true at all. The government is saying we are going to repeal 230 if you're going to selectively curate content in a political matter. They are either a host, or news. They can't operate as curated news publishers while hiding behind section 230. It's a completely valid agrument.

This isn't quite the mic drop you seem to think it is.

Ownage is ownage...well played!

Never What stakes are u playing and are u interested in a hu match? Bc I think the biggest edge I have is vs hard to convince trump supporters.

I have no interest in outsmarting you, despite what you might think.

No, I am not going to respond to posts just because you decided you want me to. I responded to a specific statement you made, which was:

This was my response:
You said my response was insane and stupid, so explain why please, instead of asking me to respond to other posts.

Right - the solution to the issue of potentially biased fact checkers is to not have fact checkers at all. Gotcha.

Me being not knowledgeable on some topics/details is not a gimmick.
I cant see if Trump is lying, i cant see if Obama is lying, i cant see Biden is lying...but i can see CNN is not unbiased. Or media in general.
Now all of a sudden Twitter is getting into the mix.

Im not neutral...but try to be as much as possible.
Guess nobody is neutral...

tnx!

It's not necessary and creates immoral and harmful opportunities.

For example: "Fact checking" those who argued for using masks a few months ago.

I'm not arguing that twitter should or shouldn't have fact checkers, but that they can if they want to, and are perfectly entitled to do so. Also arguing against the ridiculous notion that no person is capable of performing a job that requires them to set their political views aside, even if some aren't.

And the government is arguing that if they choose to do so then that defeats their privilege of section 230

Nobody in the world is qualified to moderate unbiased.
Thats my point...

Sorry, I stopped playing (online)...because they stopped hu.
Lucky u.

Does that mean you believe nothing should ever be moderated or fact checked?

All the best.

And yet we still have people in society whose job is to do literally that - e.g. judges. Weird!

I'd be wary if the ones demanding moderation were those that call everyone who disagreed with them ****ing idiots while uncharitably viewing everything in their own biased way

It is not difficult to arrive at an objective conclusion that someone is a ****ing idiot. It really doesn't require any bias at all.

Edit: you added the last part to your post after I responded, but my point stands.

Like every judge is unbiased.
U do understand that that cop also signed something promising he would be unbias.

That other poster seems to believe every human on the planet fits that description, so it should be a rhetorical question that I asked him in that he should have the belief that literally nothing should ever be moderated. If he thinks some things should be moderated, then who can do it, in a world where noone can do it properly according to him.

Now, that person seems the type that has simplistic views without really thinking them to the next levels, so he may very well genuinely believe nothing should ever be moderated, without really thinking or caring how that would manifest if it ever existed.