Quote:
Originally Posted by Elrazor
Waffle
None of this is a reply to the important facts that have been absolutely established beyond doubt.
The study you have rested your whole hypothesis on makes no claims to toy preference being a function of innate preferences.
That is a conclusion you have absolutely projected onto it.
The authors of said report make the following statement:
Quote:
It remains an open question, then, whether children in cultures with radically different stereotype referents and social norms would show the same gender-related toy preferences to those found in the current meta-analysis.
This is obviously not an open question if you try and use the study in the absolutely ham fisted bias filled way you have.
As regards primates.
Are you aware of the mountains of bullshit that humanity has attempted to give authority too via coz monkies?
Indeed invest more into that line of argument, please do, it wont be pretty.
If ever your position is reduced to coz monkies, that is total embarrassment.
And btw yes I spent a few hours outside under a parasol working on a laptop, and distracting myself on here.
Coz monkies and pissy biographical attacks are all you have left.