Quote:
Originally Posted by nutella virus
Waiting for the all lives matter thread.
Why do people support blm but not blue lives or all lives? Asked the ignorant average joe who has no idea what racism is yet decides to discuss it 24/7
Must be nice to be uneducated and ignorant af, yet still have the ability to be totally right abt something you have next to zero knowledge of
The honest answer is, people reject the idea that black lives don't matter, as a basic principal, and there is prima facie evidence they do matter. An overwhelming majority of time you hear about police brutality, it's occurring to a black person, when it actually happens to people of all races. They put a racial connotation on an issue that affects everyone. Black lives matter more than white lives to the people who produce and consume mainstream media, at least when it comes to police brutality. So, do they care about police brutality, or are they just leveraging that issue for racial equality? They basically hijack issues to make it all about racial inequality, which deserves to be talked about, but comes off a bit disingenuous when you only talk about certain cases of police brutality. To go broader, and deeper, it perpetuates an us versus them mentality. I don't support BLM because they dehumanize police, and create a polarizing atmosphere.
To most moderates, the us versus them narrative is not productive. BLM attacks/disparages cops. Rightly, or wrongly. It's not surprising you see a certain segment buy into the premise of us versus them, and side with the cops, i.e. blue lives matter.
Notwithstanding my defense of the Atlanta shooting, I can get on board with police reforms, and would not support a "Blue Lives Matter" type campaign for the same reasons I would not support BLM. It's not one, or the other.
What's going on now is, you get pretty big heat if you don't support BLM, or if you don't agree with them. That type of behavior forces people to choose sides, i.e. it's polarizing.
Last edited by itshotinvegas; 06-17-2020 at 08:51 PM.