And it was def a chick bro, never in doubt.

It is about time we got an updated schedule on the Pope being arrested. This "big name in upcoming weeks" approach is lame. What does a big name even mean. If a rando on "Dancing with the Stars" gets arrested for loitering will that count?

Anyway, as to the potential that this thing is a murder, that suggests Baldwin wanted to do it, but what would his agenda be for this? If someone set him up, how would they know he would shoot in the right place? Is the Pope involved? Guessing the Qderp will not be specific on any of this, but nice to know we can go back on the Pope arrest watch!

That's the last time I go on a vacation with you.

LOL, wow. I guess the last sentence is just the modern CT mantra, and this is our future going forward. Every high profile event is going to instantly have conspiracies cooked up about it and a bunch of people who will jump on it, because..."where there's smoke, there's always fire". It's pretty sad, really.

I, for one, am also very curious about the Pope situation. I do hope that PB will tell us more.

As PB2000 just illustrated, smoke isn't required. A wish that there was fire is good enough.

Wait until i demonstrate to them i can create smoke without fire and the idiom is not true.

:: mind blown gif ::

Good point.

We all know that smoke would be fake, just like the moon landing.

Don't you think that CTs have been put together for almost every event, like ever? Now with social media any idiot with opposable thumbs can tweet it.

Lets just say it predates Biblical times and almost certainly has been a thing as long as mankind has had critical thought.

He was convinced it was a CT.

I mean--I gotta think it was pretty easy to convince the other cavemen you could talk to spirits in the clouds. Slap together a little outfit--do a few tricks. He told me he wants you guys to go kill some food and try not to die we're hungry. I'll hang back here at the cave and keep an eye on the chicks

Project Veritas just blew the lid of Ilhan Omars voter fraud machine.

To the extent they are today? I suppose there might be lone nutjobs who would've come up with one for Halyna Hutchins, but I'm not so sure. But yeah, your last sentence was my main point - whether a few people came up with them before or not, now they spread. Every time.

Why are you not linking to such a major development? Are you trying to suppress it??

I used to join a friend back in the early 2000's to listen to conspiracy people speak. Kind of an old PTA type setting.
Was this one ex FBI agent Ted Gunderson talking about how the govt and elites were flying children all around the country in private airplanes as part of a high level pedophile ring. Sounded so insane, couldn't believe people were buying into it.
Then Epstein's 1st arrest came.
Always remembered that guy.

Project Veritas whistleblowers are conspiracy theorists? Interesting take.

Heres the Wisconsin audit report - https://www.maciverinstitute.com/202...-audit-report/

Ya I don't see anything anywhere on this but think perhaps he saw articles from Oct 2020 subsequent to which Project Veritas was busted for lying and fabricating information about Ilhan Omar and Election fraud, and thought they were new info.

But I guess we will watch this space for the next big reveal.

Well they are proven liars and fabricators of misinformation including CT's, so yes.

But please, provide us the link to whatever you are reading and reporting on here. Thx in advance.

Thats news to me. What did they lie about?

I call. The NY Times got busted, embarrassed and humiliated. Reminds me of you.

The New York Times defended calling Project Veritas' Minnesota Ballot Harvesting videos "deceptive" by arguing this was simply an "unverifiable expression of opinion."

Project Veritas pointed out this "opinion" was printed in the news section of The New York Times and the Court agreed: "if a writer interjects an opinion in a news article (and will seek to claim legal protections as opinion) it stands to reason that the writer should have an obligation to alert the reader ... that it is opinion." The Times did not do so, and the Court found this troubling.

The Court found Project Veritas demonstrated "a substantial basis in law and fact that the Defendants [The New York Times] acted with actual malice, that is, with knowledge that the statements in the Articles were false or made with reckless disregard of whether they were false or not" and Project Veritas should be permitted to "conduct discovery."

Well the Ilhan Omar stuff for just one...

At least you admit you are ignorant about some of the most commonly known things. That is a start.

You can read up here to actually learn a lot about Project Veritas and why they are the embodiment of fake news.

Great if you "Call" you actually have to show your hand then.

Show us what you got? What are you referring to above?

And its not the first time the NY Times has lied to the credulous muppets about PV - https://www.projectveritas.com/news/...tas-hit-piece/

So you'll stop reading the NY Times, right?

Follow the link, genius

heh on trying to create equivalency between the New York Times and the derp stuff you read as they monetize you.

Regardless, what are your specific predictions about what this latest earth changing thing (that nobody cares about) will do moving forward. Be specific what you expect to happen. Feel free to add in Pope arrest dates as needed. Thanks!

All the best.

When you dismiss someone confessing to voter fraud and insist that there is no voter fraud, you're completely and utterly lost. No point engaging with you.