So what would you have done when Kinder Morgan walked? I've trouble taking con faux outrage on this seriously. Cons LOVE pipelines. It's probably their number two or three policy plank. I don't think they should be built, but cons sure do. And the liberals took a path to ensure it would happen. Can you really be that upset about process details of how the pipeline the cons want built is going to get built?
I think its a great example of how Trudeau will never get credit from conservatives. He bought the pipeline they love, zero credit. He slashed middle class tax rates, zero credit.
Quote:
Uke you keep telling me Trudeau is so much ahead of Scheer on Climate change. I have yet to hear what Trudeau is doing in the next 4 years just what he plans for 2050.
This question is like asking what Harper's plan to help corporations is the year after he axed the legs off the corporate tax rate. That WAS the plan. And Scheer's plan, in the analogy, is to completely reverse it. So this is a defensive election, not an offensive one like 2015.
We've spoken already about how I have progressive critiques of the carbon tax, that it is too little, too late. However, it is an absolutely crucial mechanism that makes modest improvements now and can be scaled to make big difference in the future. Of course there are other planks whether it is the business tax credits, consumer tax credits, EV incentives, tree planting etc, but they're just frills in comparison to the importance of the carbon tax.
Scheer's plan is a bad joke: make polluters invest in technology and sell it to china! And more pipelines! Puhlease.
The simple fact is this: Voting for Scheer is equivalent to saying you do not give a **** about climate change. It is inexcusable in 2019, particularly after the decade of utter inaction under Harper. The same is true of the liberals, of course, but it is hard to have a more clear lesser of two evils problem.
Last edited by uke_master; 10-20-2019 at 11:25 PM.