Quote:
Originally Posted by BrookTrout
What do you mean by "media"? Front-page CBC website articles complaining about what he's doing? I see plenty of columnists writing up critiques of things the government has done. I haven't recently watched one of his news conferences, but they always seem to be followed by the media asking questions and him providing evasive non-answers - but what else is new.
If someone is looking for hyper-partisanship content, just read the comments below any article and you can get your fill of low-information vitriol.
One other thing about doing it during a national crisis: it's generally bad politics. Look at the coverage Derek Sloan (and by extension Scheer and the PC party) are getting now. There's a smart way to criticize during a crisis, but most of the up and coming PC leadership candidates appear to have either the tact or the intelligence to pull it off.
I have watched Global, Power and Politics and CTV National on a consistent basis and 10 minutes each on the RCMP tragedy and yes the fact that they never issued an amber alert cost lives. I cant imagine a RCMP car pulling up with a guy in uniform and even thinking anything bad.
I have yet to see anything on Trudeau the man of science being briefed in Jan by the Five Eyes that this will be a huge problem and having the Federal Health officer herself writing a full report in 2008 on this exact scenario.
The other nations all have Conservative right wingers that debate climate change. So no excuse for Mr Science guy Trudeau.
I saw one report were they used the blood on their hands referring to the RCMP on how they handled the massacre.
Applies to Trudeau as well and DR Tam
Though to Trudeauès credit he has not suggested disnifect shots