Quote:
Originally Posted by TrollyWantACracker
This is one of those topics that came up from time to time in a previous iteration of the politics forum that (ironically enough) didn't allow for free discussion. In academia, environmental determinism had pretty much been tossed out along with phrenology and social darwinism despite the fact that it has always maintained a popular appeal (I am sure Juan Valdez can elaborate). GGS doesn't quite carry the stigma of the Bell Curve but you can certainly get an earful in some quarters.
Well, Diamond addresses this. I am paraphrasing, but he basically says when he was in New Guinea one of the locals asked him point blank why white men have so much more **** than they did, and he admitted he didn't have a very good answer. So he decided to research and answer the question himself, and GGS is the culmination of those efforts. And once you get past all the preaching and moralizing and name calling (these are my own words, he was much more diplomatic) no one has yet come up with a better theory, so it is what it is.
One anecdote from the pod that was amusing, that Harris brought up the topic of probable genetic divergence explaining why traits, including mental ones, may vary between isolated populations; and Diamond said he agreed, but took it in an interesting direction. He argued that for mainland populations, the most intense evolutionary pressure was due to disease, so much of our evolution was focused towards disease resistance. In New Guinea, which didn't have this selective pressure, he hypothesized there was possibly more evolution for situational intelligence; which could explain why he found the average New Guinea person to be much more mentally acute and curious about the world than the average white westerner. (That was me paraphrasing what I remember him saying, so don't get too caught up in specific word choices, but I think I got the broad strokes right)