Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread

07-22-2019 , 11:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luckbox Inc
So they were making $10/hr at 40 hours per werk and now he is paying them $15 to only work 26?
Yeah sure that would better. You speculated that he would be hiring additional workers to make up the extra 14 hours though.
Ok, so you didn't read the article and are posting entirely based on unfounded assumptions you made, good to know.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-22-2019 , 11:28 AM
What is the bottom line to the Sanders campaign? Are the changes neutral? Are they spending more or will they be saving money?
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-22-2019 , 11:36 AM
Are we workshopping? I don't really do improv. If you want to work backwards from your premise that sanders is bad and teh socialisms are dumb you're gonna have put in some effort yourself. Though if skim reading a 10 paragraph article is beyond you then I'm not holding out too much hope.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-22-2019 , 11:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomdemaine
Are we workshopping? I don't really do improv. If you want to work backwards from your premise that sanders is bad and teh socialisms are dumb you're gonna have put in some effort yourself. Though if skim reading a 10 paragraph article is beyond you then I'm not holding out too much hope.
We aren't workshopping and I haven't said anything about Sanders or socialism.
I agree that salaries for workers making that sort of money oftentimes has the effect of taking advantage of those employees. So it is good that Sanders is making changes. I think the newsweek tweet could have been better worded and I still haven't read the article. It was my mistake to assume they were hourly and I take full responsibility for that.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-22-2019 , 11:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomdemaine
If they're hourly then reducing their hours will have no effect on their hourly rate. If the campaign are reducing their hours to increase the hourly rate they must be salaried. You're a logic guy aren't you? Even if you weren't you could try perhaps reading the article?

Do try to keep up.
So, they have to take a second job, and work more hours....to be able to survive.

The $15 wage did not accomplish anything. More free time, but they apparently cant afford to work for the same amount of money..no matter how much free time you give them. The point is, they want more money...reducing hours does not accomplish that, when the pay at the end is the same thing.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-22-2019 , 12:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by itshotinvegas
So, they have to take a second job, and work more hours....to be able to survive.

The $15 wage did not accomplish anything. More free time, but they apparently cant afford to work for the same amount of money..no matter how much free time you give them. The point is, they want more money...reducing hours does not accomplish that, when the pay at the end is the same thing.
I don't mind having a laugh at the Sanders' campaign here, but what actually happened is that field organizers were being being $36K annually, but working 60 hours p/week. Now they are still being paid $36K annually, but limited to working 40 p/week.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-22-2019 , 12:14 PM
It accomplished people working fewer hours for the same money which is the only thing it is intended to accomplish. I agree that $15 minimum wage does go nearly far enough in addressing deep structural poverty. We need far more left wing solutions.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-22-2019 , 12:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Original Position
I don't mind having a laugh at the Sanders' campaign here, but what actually happened is that field organizers were being being $36K annually, but working 60 hours p/week. Now they are still being paid $36K annually, but limited to working 40 p/week.
Yeah, I know. However, in the article it talked about the financial strain of working there, not the long hours. The union was trying to get a raise, but the campaign would only do that if health care was cut.

Outside of that, I always figured people who worked for campaigns did it because they believed in the person, not to feed their family.

Last edited by itshotinvegas; 07-22-2019 at 12:46 PM. Reason: cut redundant part
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-22-2019 , 12:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by itshotinvegas
Yeah, I know. However, in the article it talked about the financial strain of working there, not the long hours. The union was trying to get a raise, but the campaign would only do that if health care was cut.

Outside of that, I always figured people who worked for campaigns did it because they believed in the person, not to feed their family.
Of course it depends on the person, but many field organizers move from campaign to campaign. Others are hoping to eventually get a better job working for the candidate or some other politician.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-22-2019 , 02:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Original Position
I don't mind having a laugh at the Sanders' campaign here, but what actually happened is that field organizers were being being $36K annually, but working 60 hours p/week. Now they are still being paid $36K annually, but limited to working 40 p/week.
Right, Sanders found a loophole in paying his staff less than $15 an hour. When called on it he made changes.... by reducing hours, not wages. Spending stayed the same afaik. These are the kind of things that have been argued with bernie and the $15 crowd for ages. He's literally acting out part of the counter argument.

Bernie rails against the rich which he defines as those who have more millions than himself or i guess those with 4 or more houses. then he fights for the working class and $15 an hour but when running his own budget hes using loopholes and then when caught, reducing their hours, not increasing his spending on their wage. Classic stuff
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-22-2019 , 03:42 PM
Yes Bernie's employees are "salaried" but if the employees measure their pay in $/hr worked and an adjustment was made in hrs worked to make the $/hr match a certain metric then it's not inconsistent to treat this as similar to hrly employees vs management.

Also, the employees are not concerned with hours worked but their ability to make a living so a cut in hrs worked does literally nothing for them but arbitrarily make their $/hr number go up. Bernie flat refuses to pay them more.

So yeah it's pretty funny that an old rich socialist butts up against the tradeoffs of the policies he espouses and predictably all that idealism goes out the window.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-22-2019 , 03:50 PM
It should be illegal to pay salaries that low. There is too much room for abuse there which I know from experience.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-22-2019 , 04:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huskalator
Yes Bernie's employees are "salaried" but if the employees measure their pay in $/hr worked and an adjustment was made in hrs worked to make the $/hr match a certain metric then it's not inconsistent to treat this as similar to hrly employees vs management.

Also, the employees are not concerned with hours worked but their ability to make a living so a cut in hrs worked does literally nothing for them but arbitrarily make their $/hr number go up. Bernie flat refuses to pay them more.

So yeah it's pretty funny that an old rich socialist butts up against the tradeoffs of the policies he espouses and predictably all that idealism goes out the window.
They're unionised and the union is negotiating. They've already won concessions and are likely to win more. That's how this is all supposed to work. I can see this trend of right wingers attacking the left from the left while at the same time supporting people 100 times worse than those they are attacked is going to be a thing. Love to see it.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-22-2019 , 04:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomdemaine
I can see this trend of right wingers attacking the left from the left while at the same time supporting people 100 times worse than those they are attacked is going to be a thing. Love to see it.
Nothing wrong with pointing out hypocrisy.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-22-2019 , 05:18 PM
Bernie, playing the role of management, doesn’t act like having a unionized shop is the end of the world.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-22-2019 , 05:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huskalator
Also, the employees are not concerned with hours worked but their ability to make a living so a cut in hrs worked does literally nothing for them but arbitrarily make their $/hr number go up.
This can't be true. I can't imagine many employees not being delighted to get the same money for less hours.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-22-2019 , 05:35 PM
Just on BS - I've no idea of election campaigning law in the USA. Does he have constraints on how much he can spend?
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-22-2019 , 05:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
Just on BS - I've no idea of election campaigning law in the USA. Does he have constraints on how much he can spend?
No.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-22-2019 , 05:40 PM
Ok txs
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-22-2019 , 05:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huskalator
Nothing wrong with pointing out hypocrisy.
It's the handmaiden of virtue though.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-22-2019 , 06:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huskalator
Nothing wrong with pointing out hypocrisy.
There is if doing so results in your own hypocrisy
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-22-2019 , 06:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
There is if doing so results in your own hypocrisy
Do tell
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-22-2019 , 06:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
This can't be true. I can't imagine many employees not being delighted to get the same money for less hours.
I would, you probably would I'm guessing, but these people are making a pretty low wage and are struggling to make ends meet if the employee's comments are to be believed.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-22-2019 , 06:31 PM
Bernie does economics... and the crowd goes wild!
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-22-2019 , 06:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomdemaine
They're unionised and the union is negotiating. They've already won concessions and are likely to win more. That's how this is all supposed to work.

Oh I agree 100% and there would be no issue if Bernie did not also call for everyone else(but himself apparently) to stop paying "starvation wages".
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote

      
m