I dunno about that. To me civilian means non military.
But in a Kibbutz some 65 year old who served in the IDF 45 years ago is military, right? Even if he was a cook.
Let's not forget that less than 20% of IDF enlistees are combat rolls. You've got nurses, cooks, engineers, electricians etc.... Oh man gotta kill all those ex-Spartans. Right PW? Someone who installed lights in 1974 for the IDF is definitely a military target today in the village where he picks avocados.
Or like....we can stop this ridiculous conversation.
Im not sure this is true or that many people will agree. The line was crossed when they stole the land in the first place and economic targets are just as legitimate as military targets in a situation like this.
So, do you believe any native American tribe should have carte blanche to bomb any office building in the US?
I already looked it up and read that all hostage taking is considered a war crime by the conventions. So forget those arguments that Hamas (the government of Gaza) did not commit any war crimes. They committed a war crime, so they get war crimes in return. Where are the arrest warrants for all the Hamas leadership?
Does Sinwar not count? I maybe don't get the question.
Quote:
The International Criminal Court is seeking arrest warrants for Hamas leader in Gaza Yahya Sinwar and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity over the October 7 attacks on Israel and the subsequent war in Gaza, the court’s prosecutor Karim Khan told CNN’s Christiane Amanpour in an exclusive interview on Monday.
I never said they didn’t commit war crimes lmao. I said I don’t know.
And of course Israel has 20-50x as many hostages. So that means Israel has done 20-50c as many war crimes, is that correct?
Umm war crimes don’t mean you get to do war crimes but I’m glad you’re able to freely admit that’s what’s going on.
I fully admit that what the Geneva convention considers to be war crimes have almost certainly been committed, by both sides, in every war that has ever occurred. That's why the whole thing is laughable and it's ridiculous to even use the phrase "war crime".
The ICC issued one the other day. It doesn't matter, of course, because you're making yet another classic Whatabout deflection.
I didn't hear about any being issued right after 10/7. But the ICC is a ridiculous organization, as the whatabouts could be fairly applied to every war in history.