Yeah but she can't remember what colour top she was wearing 35 years ago. Chess and mate, libs.

Looks like I have to vote Biden now.

Sure it is.

Is the claim here really that media outlets have a bias, and this is controversial brand new information?

I imagine that the reason this story in particular wasn't picked up is that even total nitwits didn't buy it.

The claims made by the Trump campaign that this shows corruption by Joe Biden have been debunked by Fox News. I know why you propagate untrue information. You lack the intelligence to read an understand stories at an adult level.

So far you have failed to point out anything the NYT and WaPo has done wrong, let alone tech companies. You are claiming that they used different and wrong editorial judgment for Kavanaugh, but that doesn't imply that to be fair they should use bad editorial judgement against Biden as well.

Hahahahaha oh wow

In order to believe that bullshit, you have to, at the very least, find some pretty credible stories at least as facially incredible as the Rudy caper, which is laughable.

The veracity of the story is the a huge chunk of ballgame for its amount of reporting, and laptopgate has none.

That the media is ignoring/suppressing it rather than refuting it, while doing zero investigation from the start, tells you everything you need to know. It's not like they fact checked it, and decided not to cover it. They refused to cover it from the start. They can't and have not refuted it. They are not being journalists.

Hahahahahahhahahahaha

HIV over here insisting that the truth of the story is not an issue because he believes it is 100% true.

You don't think the other media groups did any investigation into the story? Maybe they did and found out it was complete bullshit.

It's weird that another email story comes out right before the election. This time it isn't even the president, it's his son who isn't running for anything. The only reason the Trump regime is all on this is they know they're f'ed. If they were running a legitimate campaign, nobody would care about this. I feel bad for the ass hats who believe this story.

If the worst case is true, what does this prove, Biden's son is corrupt. Guess what the entire Trump team is corrupt and his entire family is basically part of his team. It's complete nepotism to the max. Trump breaks laws like it's his job. He just broke another one with his voting, again. But Trump and his family don 't play by the rules but everyone else does, apparently.

I don't know, my experience is that nearly every time a conservative alleges that the media isn't covering a story that it actually is covering that story. Let's see...NYT has multiple stories on Hunter Biden and his laptop in the last few days...WaPo has a bunch of newsy articles about the story and opinion articles critical of the story.

That first NYT article goes into detail about how the story was shopped by the Trump campaign. It was initially given to the WSJ, but they couldn't confirm it quickly enough so it was given to the NYP instead. I'm not seeing any scandal in how the WSJ handled the story.

Do those news agencies have any repudiation by Hunter or Joe Biden as to the veracity of the laptop, or emails? Oh wait, Joe Biden said it was from the Russians, which was lie. They are just talking about how the NYP story is unsubstantiated, right, but they will parrot Joe Biden's lies with no qualification, right?

They can talk about the unverified and unsubstantiated nature of the story all they want.

Wow.

Man, even joe6pack (RIP) would have the sense not to accept that NYP story as written.

Do those news agencies have any repudiation by Hunter or Joe Biden as to the veracity of the laptop, or emails? Or, are they just talking about how the NYP story is unsubstantiated?

They can talk about the unverified and unsubstantiated nature of the story all they want.

You keep trying this tact. It's not about whether it's true or not. The truth has been irrelevant for years, which is why Kavanaugh is a rapist, the Covington kid is a racist, and Smollet was a hero, briefly. Let's not forget "hands up, don't shoot".

This is just false. Here is a NYT article from three days ago laying out the allegations and the evidence for them. Here is another one reporting on the Bidens and China in light of the new evidence. If your complaint is that the NYT treats obviously fishy oppo dump from Trump's lawyer as fishy, well, okay, then you've really climbed down from "Bigger Scandal Than the Actual Story."

EDIT: I don't want to be unfair here, so maybe you just think the laptop scandal is really small, in which case, maybe you're right?

Do you understand the concept of standards of evidence? Just because something is not proven 100% doesn't mean it's 0% likely. The evidence against Kavanaugh was much more compelling than the evidence for this story (of which there is none, inasmuch as I can tell).

You're basically the guy who says that every hand is 50-50, either you win it or you don't, and means it, right?

Jussie Smollett filed a police report. The media reported on the contents of the police report. I am sure if a right winger files a false police report and it's newsworthy, the media will report on that too. When it turned out the police report was false, they reported that it was a false report. What more do you want?

"The purported meeting never occurred".

So, are the emails real? If they are real why is someone emailing Hunter about meeting with his father? Most of that NYT story is an attempt to discredit the NYP story without actually discrediting it.

I mean, people made alot of bones about a Trump surrogate trying to peddle foriegn access to Trump, which became russia-gate.

Out of curiosity - is the plan to continue to obsess about Hunter, and the general lack of people caring about it, after Trump gets squashed, or will you move onto another topic at that time? Just curious, and my suggestion is that you and your kin continue to go on and on and on about Hunter for the next 9 days or so, as it is a great issue for you to put weight behind this election cycle. Thanks!

All the best.

Again, it's not about them specifically not reporting the story. The truth doesn't matter to these editors (this goes for Fox as well). Once you grasp that concept, you will grasp they selling narratives, irrespective of the truth.

My issue is the corruption of journalism, irrespective of Hinter Biden. I'm sure Trumpkins have a different view.

BTW, wouldn't a FOIA claim get acess to the contents of the computer the FBI has?

I assure you Fox magically doesn’t air negative stuff about Trump and the Republican Party unless it’s substantiated. The reason nobody other then the right news is airing this stuff is because the story is so poorly constructed it makes no sense. I’m betting if they’re real, they hacked Hunter and obviously that source isn’t going to fly.

I assume that means you will move onto the next story fed to you after he gets crushed that happens to match Trumpkin beliefs perfectly by sheer coincidence.

No matter, just push hard on the Hunter thing for now, whatever agenda you want to create, as Trump needs everyone do do their part to get him the result he deserves. Thanks!

All the best.

I voted for Biden, bro.

Obviously, King nitwit bought it.