Interesting. So you rage over Trump election "fraud" while you essentially voted for Biden.

Pretty sure trump insists on 100%

People can logically be upset over a fraudulent election

And I wouldn’t say I rage over it I just acknowledge it happened

Quite possible. But at least we avoided that c u next Tuesday Hillary

Lol. 100% you voted for Trump. I don't blame you for not admitting it, though.

I actually didn’t. I was in Vegas the night of the election. I really didn’t care. But I will say that trump opened my eyes to the ((leftist)) agenda

By the way, do these people just feel the need to complain whine and protest everything just for the sake of doing it?

https://www.timesofisrael.com/invoki...aining-center/

Open letter to the ATF and E... CONCERNING Rule making and law.

https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/ev...-testimony.pdf

March 6, 2023
The Honorable Steven Dettelbach
Director
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Washington, DC 20226
Dear Director Dettelbach:
The Committee on the Judiciary continues to conduct oversight of the Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF). We have written the ATF with several requests for
information and documents regarding the agency’s efforts to regulate firearms through the
rulemaking process. We have additional questions, for which we write to request testimony from
relevant ATF employees.
The ATF’s lack of transparency comes after the agency issued a final rule banning
stabilizing pistol braces,1 and as the agency continues to shut down lawful businesses through the
“zero-tolerance” policy for federal firearms dealers (FFLs).2 Just last year, the United States
Supreme Court held in West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency that under the major
questions doctrine, “given both separation of powers principles and a practical understanding of
legislative intent, the agency must point to ‘clear congressional authorization’ for the authority it
claims.”3 This ruling raises serious doubts about ATF’s ability to regulate pistol braces absent a
clear mandate from Congress


ATF and E just got Bitch slapped.

Bushes trash. Obama/Hillary/Biden- trash , trump- trash that helped the Russians invade Ukraine

Interesting. Do you know what state he was registered to vote in? If not , how can you make such a wild statement?

True Jews should protest injustice where they see it. They are an anti violence religion but the Israelis don’t care.

yup

georgia, my single vote didn't make a difference

funny how more police training is a bad thing now

More like Jim Jordan earning his snaps from the gun lobby than a bitch slap.



Yes, I do.

Cry more bro

I'm guessing the tax payers in that county have paid more than $90mil in police misconduct lawsuits over the last 20 years. But let's take that money and build them a country club.

Just reality, bro. You think this is going to go anywhere? You need the Senate. The best candidate the reds ran for Senate was a crudites-eating mountebank who lost to a stroke victim.

I hope the ATF SBR thing gets over turned in court and then congress does the right thing and passes a law that every gun needs to be registered, full stop.
Don't get the no register crowd. When some kid in Chicago gets killed by a handgun, the history of sales of that gun should be able to be tracked. If someone broke the law by either not legally selling the gun, not registering it or not reporting it stolen, they go to jail.

Well, to be brutally honest, you do realize who is responsible for making Law, correct?

Because it's certainly not the President of the United States... NOR is it an enforcement agency.

Well, to be brutally honest, you do realize who is responsible for defining what a short barrelled rifle is, correct?

Because it certainly is not the President of the United States... NOR is it Congress.

It’s almost like there was a rule made so that none of this would ever matter.

you're going to loose that argument captain obvious...

Yeah, that argument is definitely loose. What do you think is going to happen, captain obvious? Enlighten us on the process.

On top of this the same people who want to confiscate legally owned guns are mainly agnostic towards criminals who carry illegal guns and use them in crimes. Show me a progressive Democrat run city with strict gun laws, and I will show you a city with a tremendous amount of people walking around the streets illegally carrying, and local DAs and oftentimes mayors who are antagonistic towards any effort to enforce gun laws.

An amusing irony of the Lightfoot fall from grace in Chicago, is that she was actually partially receptive towards trying to work on Chicago's gun crime and deadly violence issue, but whatever measures she tried to enact were blocked by the progressive DA Foxx, but she is the one taking the fall.

Doubtful.

I'll just ask this: why should I be against having my guns registered or microstamping?

Try and give an answer that doesn't go deep into CT land, if possible.

https://abc7chicago.com/chicago-shoo...lice/11079879/

I personally would love a good faith gun control effort. But this is not what the Democratic Party is offering.

The above link was a deadly gun battle that took place on the streets of Chicago, a city with strict gun laws which are not enforced at all. DA Foxx declined to charge anyone with a crime. The collective response of the gun control establishment towards this egregious response was agnosticism.

Given this, how can any sane person take Democrat gun control advocates as being good-faith sincere actors?

What does any of that have to do with my question?