Quote:
Originally Posted by Montrealcorp
Trump was above the law because of the idiot AG Barr that cant apply the law .
there is some serious reform needed in that system if the republicans really want to save their constitution and their democratic republic.
Trump exposed how many areas need reform within gov't but none more so than the AG office.
A power mad POTUS supported by a corrupt AG who puts loyalty over the Country and constitution becomes almost unstoppable.
It exposed how impotent the House becomes as they rely on the DOJ to investigate and enforce any abuses against them.
Nothing magnified it more than the difference in how members of Congress treated being subpoenaed to testify before Mueller, compared to being subpoenaed to testify before The House, after the conclusion of the Mueller investigation. They were terrified and largely compliant with Mueller and laughed and openly mocked The House.
They knew Barr had their back in any House attempted sanction and it would go nowhere.
And i cannot figure out what the remedy is? Simply making the AG report to Congress instead could face the same issues.
What i am starting to believe is that the US does require a Constitutional Court and that is either a separate Court to the SC or they assign a certain few members (maybe 3) when such issues are brought before them by any of the 3 bodies (POTUS, Senate, House).
This Court is not one that seeks 'findings' but instead simply must judge if the issues being argued for some form of mediation are sufficient to require action and then what form that action should take.
So for example with the "Trump/Russia Collusion' issue the House could petition this Court to review it (had the AG refused) and if the Court thought it was seditious they could take any of many actions including appointing a Special Counsel to investigate and defining its scope.
They would not then hear the case or results if brought. That would go through the normal channels.
Sure this Court could be political in its actions but I think it would be the least likely to get corrupted reliably in matters like this that are investigatory and not determinative.