I hope he hasn't finally lost it.

You (we) may have been in even bigger danger than I thought.

Largely yes, but he did bring in more R irregular voters and slightly shifted the coalition to more male centric across racial groups. I wonder how any of the right wing media candidates would do though. Trump had wide spread name recognition, what is Tucker Carlson or Sean Hannity going to inspire in anyone outside of the normal conservative coalitions?

China sure did fine without them

Trump wasn't any genius in pulling it off, he was just being his blusterous, showman, demagogue, racist, faux bullying self ... and the fact that suckers abound in the populace created the response to him, not any calculation on his part. Yeah, Woodward just said that his presidency has been strategy free since the beginning, and although there was some plotting re the unfolding of the election, it wasn't by Trump.

Its's not Trump's political "style" they should emulate but they need to champion the deplorables. Trump didn't function well above any R in the blue wall states the past two cycles because of style.... it was because he ran as an economic populist which sold well in PA, WI, MI and OH... far better than 2 Bush runs as well as McCain and Romney. That's the winning coalition for the R's

I just don’t understand the claim of trump on fraudulent election ....

A lot more chance fraud did happen for trump in 2016 , losing the popular vote , while Biden won both popular vote and the election ...


And why just fraud the presidency and not the senate ?
It makes no sense but than again , reasoning isn’t the forte of a lot of republicans ...

Trump is like a kid crying in the middle of the mall because he didn’t got his candy, so he needs to make a scene .

Ps: Actually , why not the democrats just start saying , with has much evidence as trump has ( which is none) , that trump did benefit from fraud cause he won more states and popular votes that he should of have ????
What makes Trump stance more credible than the other way around ??

Btw if fraud did happened , why only in the states where it was close ?

And why wasn't the Senate also handily won?

Trump ran behind the Republican House vote by around 3 points in 2016 and this year. I see little evidence that he runs ahead of other Republicans. Trump might be more popular among Republican voters than their other politicians, but that doesn't mean that he is more broadly acceptable to the electorate as a whole.

There comes a time in this post-election period where it needs to be given consideration whether President Trump and his Cabinet members refusing to perform their transition duties might be committing acts of treason.

And apparently the fraud only happened in certain districts in a State. The districts where Trump lost, while the nearby district if Trump won, was fine.

Add to that the same voters on the same ballots supported GOP Senators and House representatives to success. SO it seems the Dem fraudsters changed part of the ballot but not the other part or they filled out fake ballots against Trump but FOR the GOP representative.

Hmmmm????

This is pretty much the pattern in all blue wall states.

We're going to look like a banana republic you dumb libs--now move over I'm trying to subvert the election in a few states

agree - refusing transition duties is same as sabotaging the country.

A lot of people hated Trump, and probably never voted before or cared about voting otherwise. I mean, if this is indeed a rigged scam, why would the parties who had the ability to organize and pull this off (none of whom have leaked this) not also bother with filling in other races to cover their tracks?

I totally get what people like you are trying to imply and what you want dummies to believe, but honestly you could say Lizard People were involved and a lot of those same dummies would be with you as long as it was for their agenda, so why not just make it more entertaining, like how you guys spent all that time dissecting and discussing videos of Hunter's package or hold more press conferences at landscape companies. That stuff is a lot more fun than new player boomswitch style riggie theories like what you are posting about now in terms of quality. You can do better, and you really need to to trigger the libs posting their apocalyptic wet dream scenarios.

All the best.

Their job is to prepare for a transition to the next presidency. As Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said yesterday, they are preparing to transition into a second Trump term

(if we aren't allowed to quote the secretary of state in a politics forum will a mod please pm me why? assuming I accidentally forgot to post this but maybe it was ninja deleted?)

lol Pompeo

Being filed in Wayne County ( Detroit ) today:

https://www.greatlakesjc.org/press-r...lection-fraud/

https://www.greatlakesjc.org/wp-cont...h-Exhibits.pdf

Why bogus up votes in CA where you are winning by millions of votes.... for what purpose?

LOL

Ah yes, after Mike Pompeo, Secretary of State, said that they were preparing for a second Trump term, he let out a small chuckle. (More like a smile than a chuckle, but I'll grant that it might have been a chuckle)

Though I should note that it didn't sound like a "haha I'm just kidding" chuckle.

It was the type of laugh an incredulous parent lets out when their child asks something so blatantly obvious that the parent can't control the momentary slip. He was not making a joke. He was dead serious.

Edit to add: Really, really absurd post delete by the way. I quote the secretary of state and my post is deleted because I didn't mention what his facial expression was during the statement? Lmfao

In no way did I misrepresent what he said or say anything untrue. Once again disappointed by the inconsistent moderation

We will disagree on this. To me, this was the best a Republican can do trying to manage a joke.