Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
***Election Week Sweat Thread***  (renamed) ***Election Week Sweat Thread***  (renamed)
View Poll Results: Presidential Prediction?
Biden wins a landslide
42 50.00%
Biden ekes it out
29 34.52%
Trump ekes it out
8 9.52%
Trump wins a landslide
5 5.95%

11-03-2020 , 01:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Natamus
Well respecting you was fun while it lasted! ***Election Week Sweat Thread***  (renamed)

Your Former Friend,
The Non-Violent BLM supporter who was called the N-Word by a Trump supporter in his Condo complex who literally said to me “I will end that BLM N—-er”
In front of my wife and 16-month-old child.

I wouldn't object to that guy being punched in the face. I likewise don't condone violence from the right, at all, in any form -- and that statement is a clear threat.
11-03-2020 , 01:34 PM
Has anybody seen any Russian subversives? Remember what they did 4 years ago!
11-03-2020 , 01:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
wat
I think he means violence against Confederate statues.
11-03-2020 , 01:37 PM
It's the Chinese, Adreno. Chinese. Get back on the R point.
11-03-2020 , 01:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LKJ
Interesting thread this morning from Nate Cohn re: RCP averages.

Ok thanks. I'm not quite sure why taking an average of all the polls makes that something you can't trust, but fair enough.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shuffle
Gambler punts $5 million on Trump

https://nypost.com/2020/11/03/myster...d-setting-bet/


Didn't Alex Wice say he was betting millions on Trump?
Is that him who placed that bet? If he's betting that much, something tells me Trump will win. No one bets that amount without being sure of winning (unless they're like a billionaire and $5 million is pocket change).
11-03-2020 , 01:44 PM
Biden still holding strong. 97% to win.

https://projects.economist.com/us-20...cast/president
11-03-2020 , 01:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adrenocromo
Has anybody seen any Russian subversives? Remember what they did 4 years ago!
I don't have a Facebook account, but reports are you can find some there if you were so inclined.
11-03-2020 , 01:46 PM
cant believe we dont have the first counties closed itt already..

dixxville/millsfield counties in NH.
total votes-

trump-16
biden-10



2016 was trump 18 clinton 8 apparently.
11-03-2020 , 01:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shuffle
That's not how it works.



https://nypost.com/2020/11/02/us-ele...ion-in-wagers/


At one site, over 90% of wagers in the last 24 hours were on Trump. These are unsophisticated punters lighting money on fire in a huge liquidity bubble, nothing more.

Without knowing prices, that conclusion is impossible to assess -- isn't it?
11-03-2020 , 01:56 PM
Anybody following Iowa closely? According to polling Trump should win but according to early voting, Biden has a lead
11-03-2020 , 01:56 PM
Even money would be a dumb bet; I agree. I think we can disagree about whether getting 4:1 would be break even or not.
11-03-2020 , 01:58 PM
In for lulz
11-03-2020 , 02:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shuffle
Pretty much every expert has Trump between 4% and 10% to win.
I've played enough XCOM to know that 4-10% is roughly 40-70%.

Biden is that 95% shot to finish off the Sectopod that's about to wipe my entire squad on Ironman. I know I should be confident, but one can only get burned so many times before yips set in.
11-03-2020 , 02:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inso0
I've played enough XCOM to know that 4-10% is roughly 40-70%.
Any chance you play poker..... for money?
11-03-2020 , 02:12 PM
Just checking in here looking forward to the meltdown.
11-03-2020 , 02:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by King Spew
Cuep - Is this a personal attack on Howard? Asking for a friend.....
Hmmm re-reading i do not think so, unless we must 'sanitize' posters or otherwise simply not say things, even if true, if not perceived as nice.

I don't consider posting accurately a posters behaviour and actions personal. It is reporting on what they actually did. The only word in the entire post that I would say could be construed as personal is 'puppet' but what then is the proper and acceptable word for those who 'parrot' Trump and Fox empty points?

Its a sincere question as i will change the wording if that line is made clearer to me?
11-03-2020 , 02:16 PM
In the betting markets Trump is now 60-65% favorite to win Florida and 55% in Arizona. Biden has widened his lead overall. That doesn’t add up.
11-03-2020 , 02:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by razorbacker
In the betting markets Trump is now 60-65% favorite to win Florida and 55% in Arizona. Biden has widened his lead overall. That doesn’t add up.
Political betting markets are very inefficient. They always have been. People seem way more emotionally invested than even something like sports.
11-03-2020 , 02:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
Political betting markets are very inefficient. They always have been. People seem way more emotionally invested than even something like sports.
This is the biggest sustained large-volume gap between the best polling models and prediction markets that I remember. If Trump wins or the election is very close, I'll increase the relative credibility of prediction markets vs polls.
11-03-2020 , 02:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by King Spew
Any chance you play poker..... for money?
Not really "for money" but yes, a home game every other week or so, you humorless rube.

Much like waterfalls, I'm not chasing many 4 outers if that's what you're hoping for.

I do fall victim to the boredom spew though, from time to time. If I needed the buyins to eat, maybe I'd be happier to sit on my hands. Just balancing out that range though, amirite?
11-03-2020 , 02:27 PM
i just moved the texas line by 50 cents on one of the major sites with a bet that wasnt that big and its not like that was gonna influence the main market.. also used 0 information to do it other than gut feel so lol, money will fight on either side and get to a better idea of reality than polls with no skin in the game
11-03-2020 , 02:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inso0
Not really "for money" but yes, a home game every other week or so, you humorless rube.

Much like waterfalls, I'm not chasing many 4 outers if that's what you're hoping for.

I do fall victim to the boredom spew though, from time to time. If I needed the buyins to eat, maybe I'd be happier to sit on my hands. Just balancing out that range though, amirite?
Thanks for playing.
11-03-2020 , 02:33 PM
(null)
His links are direct from breitbart.
11-03-2020 , 02:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Original Position
This is the biggest sustained large-volume gap between the best polling models and prediction markets that I remember. If Trump wins or the election is very close, I'll increase the relative credibility of prediction markets vs polls.
Then you don't remember Ron Paul's betting market odds.
11-03-2020 , 02:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Original Position
This is the biggest sustained large-volume gap between the best polling models and prediction markets that I remember. If Trump wins or the election is very close, I'll increase the relative credibility of prediction markets vs polls.
It's definitely the biggest gap I can remember (though I wasn't gambling politics in 2012, wasn't that one where models varied from the conventional wisdom heavily?), but gaps between models and markets are pretty common. You could have easily gotten Trump +400 or even better in 2016 when Nate had him 29%. That's a lot of EV!

      
m