No, you still don't get it. Not sure if it's deliberate or you are just thick but I'm not wasting any more time trying to explain it to you.

Oh, I get it, Brian. You thought Biden had the authority to mandate vaccines for Congress but chose not to. It's right there in your post.

Did you forget you said that? Here, I'll remind you.

So, Brian. That mandate was for executive branch employees, because that's who Biden has authority over. He cannot mandate Congress do a dam thing any more than you or I could.

I hope that helped and you are no longer confused about why Congress was "exempt" from the vaccine mandates.

Again. No, that's not what I thought. Sheesh

My point was that Congress members were not mandated and federal employees were. That's it. Whether Biden or anyone had authority to mandate congress is not the point. The point is they were free to choose whether to get vaccinated or not. Others weren't.

And getting back to my original post, several hundred of those congress members (plus many of their staffers and family members) with covid were treated with Ivermectin and none of them were hospitalised.

GET IT?

You aren't fooling anyone.

Members of congress are federal employees.

And why did you find that an important point to make?

Cool. I had Chick-fil-a when I had covid and I wasn't hospitalized.

Get it?!

I mean you are either being deliberately obtuse or you really are that mind numbingly stupid. Those are the only two options.

Oh look, here's you claiming you weren't talking about the members of the executive branch.

It turns out you actually were and didn't realize it.

Because you have no idea what you're even talking about. The mandates you are referring to were specifically for the executive branch, not all federal employees.

No, it's the other option. You are lying and getting called out for it.

Ok. You've convinced me. It is the second option I provided, without a shadow of doubt.

That’s thee thing about Blowie, he just doesn’t know when the quit. He looks dumber and dumber each round he goes with Gorgonian.

Lol

Speaking of dumb and dumber look who's showed up.

Still claiming it wasn't members of the executive branch that were mandated, Brian, or have you "changed your mind" on that one?

another theory of mine that came out of similar or related reasons to the security and location of the backend of ai is that the vaccine program's purpose was to commute the origins of covid making it legally impossible to prove etc. For me this also more specifically came for a cryptography formalization and observation about commutative encryption.

this possibility seems to be corroborated by Sachs in the latest tucker interview:

https://x.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1795500379578253729

I've covered this earlier in the thread, but here's even more proof that I was correct. It turns out the deaths from COVID vaccinated patients were actually labeled as unvaccinated.

“That’s why ‘unvaccinated’ deaths spiked immediately after the vaccine rollout,” explained Dr. Toby Rogers.

Whenever someone has a Substack whose existence he justifies by invoking “censorship” on other social media, it’s about a 99% likelihood that his Substack will be filled with contrarian nonsense

Not necessarily. Non mainstream views relating to covid were and still are to some extent heavily censored on the biggest social media platforms. Substack for one has been a hugely valuable tool against the ongoing suppression of legitimate non approved views.

Problem is content censorship on x went away but it's far harder to monetize on x, so basically what started as a very good way to be able to talk about stuff that was (perhaps illegally, see pending litigation
In SCOTUS) censored now is often just a way to keep making money by going with the wildest possible claims.

It's true that fb and YouTube still censor stuff though.

But I mean you get censored, you open a substack, you start making money on it, you keep going your direction necessarily as it works. It will be a lot "contrarian" and often enough non sense at this point because strong anti mask, anti lockdown etc positions are now if not mainstream, acceptable discourse in a lot of places, so you need to have "really really extreme" positions to still be censored

Any content critical of the covid injections is still fairly heavily censored though. And that's not even considered an extreme position at this point.

This video clip is both hilarious and disturbing.

Doctors are baffled.

No-one mentions the giant elephant in the bedroom of course.

Reporter: Why do you think so many younger people are suffering heart attacks?

Doctor: We have an obesity epidemic.

Problem with that is all these healthy and in great shape kids who are collapsing on playing fields and on courts are not fat. I warned people on this site about using their own judgment, even posted videos of some highly respected world renowned medical professionals warning about the experimental shot but I ended up getting banned for a week for being "anti-vax" by a mod, just like all these doctors who spoke out against the shot got banned from twitter (you would think open discussions about these things would be encouraged, not silenced. What does that tell you.)

So u have clear evidences it’s because of the Covid vaccine and that before Covid no young adult ever died of heart attack ?

Those are athletes .
In soccer
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List...ield_incidents

In football
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2023/01/04/u...al-emergencies

I won’t do all the sports .
In prior years many though steroids was the cause .
Now it’s vaccine by conspiracy theorist shrug .

Give me the incidence per 100k per age bracket in time and let's see if there is a spike then we discuss.

Plural of anecdote isn't data

This has all been gone over thoroughly in this thread already. There's not been an increase.

The level of stupidity in this thread is shocking. I am surprised that Brian James hasn't been permanently banned. Others as well.

The problem with promoting the anti-vax take on social media is that older people who don't take the Covid vaccine have like a 1% to 2% chance of dying each year. Kind of like playing Russian roulette with a semi-automatic gun that chambers up to 50 to 100 bullets.

About heart attacks: young people who are at risk of heart attacks should absolutely be taking the Covid vaccine. Their risk of heart attacks skyrockets when they get Covid.

Here is an article from the American Heart Association (AHA)

"The most important thing to remember is that people with heart disease, including heart failure, are at risk of getting much sicker or even dying if they get COVID-19. So, if you have a history of heart disease or have a risk factor for heart disease or stroke, stay informed and stay cautious."

"Stay up-to-date on COVID-19 vaccinations. People with cardiovascular risk factors or heart disease, along with heart attack and stroke survivors, generally should get vaccinated and boosted against COVID-19 because they are at much greater risk from the virus than they are from the vaccine, experts say. The American Heart Association urges people with medical conditions to discuss vaccination with their health care team. "