Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Covid-19 Discussion Covid-19 Discussion

03-31-2024 , 01:55 PM
JFC they keep getting dumber and dumber. It's truly something.
03-31-2024 , 01:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ec_outlaw
JFC they keep getting dumber and dumber. It's truly something.
I completely agree with you here. It truly is something.
03-31-2024 , 02:16 PM
What makes me so happy today in 2024 is whenever I casually discuss covid with humans in public or private settings, the vast majority of them think lockdowns were stupid.

Being Pro lockdown is basically a minority opinion today.

Nature is healing.
03-31-2024 , 02:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tien
Lock down olds and put all caretakers in strict protocol and print money to alleviate their incomes. Does everything have to be spoon fed to you?
So how do those caretakers live? Do they ever come in contact with others? Are they cut off from their families? How do they eat? This sounds worse than what was implemented for them. Maybe this will be their own personal Holocaust.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tien
Huge number of non-olds, I count a little over 1000 in Canada for the entire pandemic for everyone under 50. "Huge numbers" of non olds is laughable.

Wait, did Canada have lockdowns? Wouldn't that be an example of how lockdowns helped? Why would you use statistics from a country that has lockdowns to show what wouldv'e happened without lockdowns? You feeling ok?
03-31-2024 , 02:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tien
I completely agree with you here. It truly is something.
03-31-2024 , 02:36 PM
Oh god it's like a parade.

lololol
03-31-2024 , 03:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gorgonian
Incorrect, and ignores that multiple infections are more dangerous than a single one, and ignores mutation and improvements in treatment/prevention over time. Again, you don't even know what you don't know.

So what was your answer to the question I asked? I see you ignored it completely.

I didn't read the rest of your post because you 1) were factually wrong on your very first point, and 2) ignored my question.
Exactly .
Luciom is so knowledgeable that the spike with covid in 2021 due to mutation was already in the data by March 2020 and they knew 1 year in advance that mutation was going to be less deadly then the original covid 19 strain , even tho it was more contagious .

What a bunch of garbage nonsense but unsurprising….
03-31-2024 , 03:55 PM
Yes Luciom has a timeline problem in regard to C19. All his C19 posts should have an asterisk added.
03-31-2024 , 04:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tien
What makes me so happy today in 2024 is whenever I casually discuss covid with humans in public or private settings, the vast majority of them think lockdowns were stupid.

Being Pro lockdown is basically a minority opinion today.

Nature is healing.
not healing unless we make sure it can't happen again.

otherwise we are just one bullshit away from doing it again.

states should ban stay at home orders constitutionally, the FDA and CDC have to be dismantled and so on.

and Europe is in an even worse place
03-31-2024 , 04:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by King Spew
Yes Luciom has a timeline problem in regard to C19. All his C19 posts should have an asterisk added.
lol no problem guys, just don't ask why we actively want to bring people and parties down and we relish in the suffering of people who many of you are surprised we can deeply hate.

you don't understand this is civil war level for many of us? fine.

don't be surprised if we ever get power and use it in full, without remorse, to make even with what happened and to guarantee, at any cost, it will never happen again.

many people allowed the house arrest of my children. I hold every one of them personally responsible and there is only one possible sentence.
03-31-2024 , 04:59 PM
Incredible.
03-31-2024 , 05:02 PM
2020 lockdowns were likely a mistake in hindsight, but completely fine/good given the info we had

subsequent lockdowns were simply harmful
03-31-2024 , 05:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BOIDS
2020 lockdowns were likely a mistake in hindsight, but completely fine/good given the info we had

subsequent lockdowns were simply harmful
no given literature didn't suggest them at all. not at all.

and a big no for ethical reasons as well: you should never even think of harming children because you think doing so could help elders (even if it's true).

would you cut a child leg to save the lives of x elders? would you even entertain the thought?
03-31-2024 , 05:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luciom
no given literature didn't suggest them at all. not at all.

and a big no for ethical reasons as well: you should never even think of harming children because you think doing so could help elders (even if it's true).

would you cut a child leg to save the lives of x elders? would you even entertain the thought?
03-31-2024 , 05:14 PM
an abundance of caution in the face of a new threat is usually correct, and was so in 2020
03-31-2024 , 05:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BOIDS
2020 lockdowns were likely a mistake in hindsight, but completely fine/good given the info we had

subsequent lockdowns were simply harmful
The fact that they were being pimped so hard by the ruling class was sufficient information to know that they weren't there for the benefit of society-at-large.
03-31-2024 , 05:25 PM
sounds like you have succumbed to conspiratorial thinking again
03-31-2024 , 05:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BOIDS
an abundance of caution in the face of a new threat is usually correct, and was so in 2020
absolutely not, given the threat wasn't new at all, we faced a long list if far more dangerous pathogens in the last 2k years. nothing new at all about an airborne respiratory disease.

and if anything, abundance of caution would suggest Yoh don't do anything you don't know with absolute certainty what will achieve. the last time in life you do something unprecedented is when panicking, obviously.

you didn't clearly state before you would lockdown if a respiratory disease arrives? you simply dont.

you don't do that unless you are absolutely certain it is absolutely indispensable for society survival to do so.

and you absolutely never without exception touch children unless it's for their direct benefit. never.
03-31-2024 , 05:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BOIDS
sounds like you have succumbed to conspiratorial thinking again
Right because the rich didn't get a crap ton richer during covid.
03-31-2024 , 05:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luckbox Inc
Right because the rich didn't get a crap ton richer during covid.
not during lockdowns no, a lot later.

lockdowns were an euthanasia for asset owners
03-31-2024 , 05:38 PM
the rich get richer during everything



this is old and you can add another 15000 points, but you get the idea

Last edited by BOIDS; 03-31-2024 at 05:47 PM.
03-31-2024 , 05:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BOIDS
an abundance of caution in the face of a new threat is usually correct, and was so in 2020
We knew what sort of a threat covid was after the Diamond Princess in february 2020. i.e. Not much worse than the the annual flu.
03-31-2024 , 05:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BOIDS
the rich get richer during everything
at least try to be honest.
03-31-2024 , 05:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian James
We knew what sort of a threat covid was after the Diamond Princess in february 2020. i.e. Not much worse than the the annual flu.
a lot worse than the normal flu for elders, irrelevant for anyone else yes (for whites and Asians at least).

And far LESS relevant than the flu for kids, more akin to a cold already for them since the beginning.

it was adamantly clear already in March 2020 to any rational observer.
03-31-2024 , 05:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BOIDS
the rich get richer during everything
not necessarily no, but anyway it didn't happen with European lockdowns.

      
m