Quote:
riddle me this
if the infection rates were as you claim them to be without providing any evidence lol
then how come there are such little numbers of cases?
The virus has been around since November and lockdowns did not happen till march
4 to 5 months without anything in place where most models predicted that the humans were going extinct in that time lol
The first case in the US was reported in January I believe.
Given unmitigated spread US would have seen 60% to 70% of their population infected within 6 to 8 months.
But the spread was severely mitigated in March. Even before Governors started shutting down their economies people were already self isolating and socially distancing.
The part about "most models predicted that humans were going extinct in that time" is just nonsense.
Original predictions had death rates of about 2.5%. If 70% of the worlds population did get infected then we would see about 100 million deaths. Out of 7 billion total people.
Quote:
you guys are on the wrong side of history and no matter how many lies or fake covid deaths you invent it wont change that
Studies are showing that Covid deaths are at least 20% under-reported.
Quote:
the problem with you clowns is that you have never run a business before so you don't give two ****s about it or are just ignorant
I was an owner of a computer consulting company for 7 years. I also ran my own business as a consultant prior to that for 6 years. I have been a consultant to CBS (self employed) for the past 10 years or so.
My father was a restaurant and bar owner. My wife's family founded a chemical company 2 generations ago.
The best solution to this pandemic isn't either economic shutdown or no mitigation whatsoever. The best solution is a mix of both.
If you look at South Korea, New Zealand, Australia, Germany, etc. they are re-opening their economies safely.
And even though NY was late to the party in shutting down at a cost of over 10,000 lives, NY is now going to be a model of how to re-open the economy safely and in a way that gets maximum participation.
I do have concerns about locally run businesses. My family has been ordering food at restaurants including several asian restaurants (my fear was that they were going to be discriminated against due to the President's attempt to rename the virus).
So I am willing to take risks to help ensure local businesses survive this.
Quote:
also lol@comparing the US to NZ/AUS where they have 1/10th the population and more land mass
lol at cherry picking your data.
Look at South Korea with 20% of our population and much denser geographically.
They have experienced 280 deaths. We in the US have had over 177,000 people die. If South Korea had done what we have done they would have had roughly 44,000 deaths.
Extreme incompetence results in extremely bad results.
Quote:
The whole point of flattening the curve was so that hospitals do not get overrun but NO HOSPITALS HAVE EVEN CLAIMED TO BE OVERRUN LOL
you know why? because most people already got it and recovered in jan/feb lol
You are obviously trolling.
NY's peak hospitalizations occurred on April 3. The peak 7 day rolling average occurred on April 6 and the peak 14 day rolling avg was on April 11.
NY was extremely close to being overwhelmed from an ICU capacity standpoint. Had Governor Cuomo not shutdown the economy except to essential businesses on March 23 and used the Javitt's convention center for hospitalizations, NYC hospitals would have been overrun.
See
this website which shows NY at 100% ICU capacity through the entire month of March.
But the larger point of the only reason to flatten the curve was to prevent hospitals from being overrun, is just wrong.
There are a number of other reasons to flatten the curve:
- Reduce deaths until possible treatments can be developed (as has just happened)
- Limit deaths until a vaccine can be developed.
- Put off the disease until the weather gets warmer to account for the possibility that it won't spread in the summer.
- Reduce the infection rate (R0) to the point where testing has been expanded enough to be able to contact trace and further reduce the disease spread.
Quote:
the funniest part of is that a lot of families had one member testing positive for the antibodies and their family testing negative - how can something so infectious do that? I thought even being a few meters away from someone was automatic death warrant?
anyways I will revisit this thread in a year and see what you clowns will say then
My understanding is that there are about 50% false positives from the antibody testing.
Some of that may be testing positive for other strains of Coronavirus which occurred years ago.
And it is also possible that with social distancing within the family, depending on the living conditions, could isolate the disease. My daughter came back home from California on about March 19 and we put her in the isolated guest room for 14 days.