Quote:
Originally Posted by corpus vile
He did think like that, yes, in a fairly casual way. Most people did at that time. Even Jim Joyce wrote about the natural superiority of the white race in a youthful essay.
And even 'anti-imperialists', like Sidney and Beatrice Webb of the Fabian Society, who were friends of Bertrand Russell and John Maynard Keynes, and of William Beveridge whose 1942 report eventually produced the Welfare State in Britain, were fairly fanatical antisemites, which Churchill (also a friend of Beveridge) wasn't. This was a besetting vice of liberal anti-imperialists, what you'd call the left nowadays. J.A. Hobson, the key liberal journalist of the pre-Great-War era, respectfully cited by Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and Jeremy Corbyn, was a massive and horrible antisemite, banging on about how the Boer War and global capitalism and all the world's misfortunes had been caused by string-pulling Jewish bankers, or 'men of a peculiar race' as he liked to call them.
And MK Gandhi, always one of Churchill's bugbears, wanted Indians to have equal rights in South Africa, but definitely not the blacks. Gandhi was all in favour of apartheid and disenfranchisement when it came to the blacks. He was later famous in India for saying people should be kind to Untouchables and Muslims, but he meant that as an act of charity. He definitely didn't think Untouchables or Muslims were as good as high-caste Hindus such as, for instance, himself.
Churchill didn't like Indians very much, and often said so (I don't know if you've been to India, but illiterate Indian street-people probably did look dodgy and foolish to a Victorian English army subaltern). But then, Indians don't like Pakistanis, and Pakistanis don't like Indians, and Indian Hindus certainly don't like Indian Muslims and are now favouring Hindu-nationalist measures to deny Muslims citizenship. So there's always bad stuff doing the rounds.