Literally the "first 5 non-maga comments"? Ok let's see how well you can count.

1. Not Negative.



2. Three tweets from the same dude so will count them as one. Also not negative, at least not to the Tarana's tweet itself.








4. This one is from a self-proclaimed pragmatic progressive and voting Biden


5. You call this negative?


6. Trump supporter


7. Positive


8. Ah is this the "negative tweet" you were looking for? Wow soOooO negative!


9. Not negative.



10. Trump supporter


11. Positive.


12. Positive.


13. Trump supporter


14. Warren supporter, positive tweet. Biden might lose a good portion of them.


15. OuCh wHat a buRnnNnnn, soOoOoOOoo neGatIve!


16. The rest are Biden supporters, I guess they don't get much love, because, I don't know, maybe, a lack of enthusiasm? But I guess these aren't negative, are they?


Not exactly top 5 comments. So out of 13 tweets, discounting Trump and Biden supporters, 3 could be considered remotely negative and 4 are positive.

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand there's the back-peddle.

Bonus tweet I found digging through tweet history.

Biden and his supporters seem to be the ones championing the #metoo movement only when convenient. If anyone on the left had allegations against them, we would want to hear it and make sure they have due process. Nice try trying to take me out of context but I've already gone over this point in another thread.

Biden putting together a team to help select his running mate. What a demented old toad. Can't even select a running mate himself. He is such a puppet candidate. Can't even do that alone. Another lose lose election; either loltrump or sleepy pinocchio joe. Except pinocchio became a real boy, and hair sniffing joe will be busy extracting plasma from new borns just to stand in front of his tele prompter

https://www.cp24.com/mobile/world/bi...mate-1.4918407

Wiz,

How much bullshit do you have to schlep through to stumble upon these tweets? Maybe I'm using Twitter wrong.

All Presidential candidates put teams together. You're trying a bit too hard with this one.

He's going to have a team to remember his wife's name. Of course they put teams together because nothing is their own choice. That's the point. If he had any vision or actual goals then he wouldn't need his baron robber buddies deciding for him.

I'm trying hard at what? To make the states look like a farce? You don't need me for that.

You got king trump on one end and dementia puppet on the other.

One guy can't spell and the other can't remember how to. I'm in canada I want the states to do well or we don't do well. But this is really looking like the tail end of an empire.

Biden should pick Kamala. After dating Willie Brown early in her career she probably won't mind his occasional groping.

So who is supposed to vet the VP? No vetting?

I don't understand what you want here. Do you understand?

Of course he should vet the vp. But he doesn't even need to be in the room for that to happen.

A convicted felon picked Trump's VP, although yes, unindicted co conspirator Trump made the final approval.

I suspect Biden isn't really guilty for the simple (and unscientific) reason that the Dems always have a sexual abuse allegation at their fingertips.

There are many reasons why Joe should not be president but I don't think being a rapist is one.
And even it is, we have Trump now so....what's the real issue ?

Let's move on to policies ffs.

@wiizwig, you went through a lot of work to show me that you have a different view than me on what negative is. Agree to disagree.

Bolded has been my argument all along, why does it even matter at this point? Him being or not being guilty isn't swaying anyone to make it difference in the race, so why bother except to prove or disprove Biden/Reade? The truth will become more clear one way or the other.

Speaking of which, a LOT of info has come out in the past 24 hours on social media, I suspect that's why MSNBC actually ran a story on the "scandal".

REMINDER:




BERNIE LOST




lol bros

OK Thinboomer

Seriously? What's the real issue if Biden is a rapist? Is Trump the standard now?

There is still plenty of time to re-do the primaries.

<3

Here's some more very negative tweets. It's not Chait, the article or the power dynamics at play that I'm disappointed with, it's nasty tweet threads like these

Is this sarcasm? My meter is broken.

"Okay okay everybody rapes let's just focus on Biden's amazing record and policies" lolol wtf is wrong with everyone

no

In what scenario are they going to re-do the primaries? Asking for myself.

why bother looking into if the president of the USA is credibly accused of rape?

I dont even. its not even blueMaga at this point. I dont even know what it is.

Assuming he's not being sarcastic, what he's probably saying is that nobody's opinion is going to change unless some new dramatic evidence is introduced, so why bother.

It's not going to change the way people will vote in November.

I could have worded that better, I meant why bother trying to prove/disprove them on this forum, it'll come out one way or the other.

And in the last 24 hours it hasn't looked good for the "Biden is a rapist" camp.

lol wat. the last 24 hrs have basically proven he did it. tons of evidence from 93-95 that she was incredibly upset about it and told multiple people and was retaliated against.

the only defense from the eDems has been buh buh buh PUTIN!

I do agree about prove/disprove. everyone has already made their decision. one side used facts, history, and consistency. the other side used political expediency and hypocrisy.