Quote:
Originally Posted by itshotinvegas
Again what's in his mind doesn't matter. According to orthodoxy definition of racism, the simple act of him being a white male and committimg an act of opression against POC is what makes it racist, and a hate crime.
I say this because the some of the folks you are arguing with operate under that idea. The law says they need independent proof of hate (something other than the act of murder, i.e. utterance, historical views, etc), but so far, they've haven't found any, they may still, though. I don't think they will find much, since he seemed to visit those places quite often for sex. Maybe he enjoyed having sex with Asians because he hated them.
I do believe they will find evidence he hated women, and saw them as objects.
Not to split hairs but if he murdered those people because he hated women then that's pretty much a hate crime, such things don't cover racism solely and again I think it's ultimately irrelevant as such things won't really make a difference re sentencing when it comes to multiple murders.
These type of murderers tend to be mission oriented, so if racism was the motive I'm surprised he didn't freely admit it.
Quote:
Well, I have no problem with this guy getting the needle (once proven guilty)...you will have lefties begging to save his life when his time comes, making all kinds of excuses for him. I digress, he did this in GA where they are not so...soft when it comes to the DP.
I have some leftist sympathies although certainly wouldn't be far left, but I'm against the DP so would consider life without parole sufficient. That said it's not my country or state so how they conduct such things is their biz. Although against the DP, that doesn't mean I'd have personal sympathy for this guy getting executed either, I just disagree with such sentencing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by amoeba
What do you think perps at the Nuremberg Trials claimed ?
It costs nothing to claim anything aside from hate crime, thus from an EV perspective it makes perfect sense to attempt it.
There was no concept of hate crimes and no legislation for such things at Nuremberg. Some denied responsibility, others claimed they were only following orders. Nazi war criminal Dieter Wisliceny testified at Nuremberg that Eichmann told him he would "leap laughing into the grave because the feeling that he had five million people on his conscience would be for him a source of extraordinary satisfaction". (Other accounts replace "people" with "enemies of the Reich", which ties in with Hannah Arendt's banality of evil.)
But the ones who denied or claimed to only follow orders did so as they hoped they would avoid the gallows.
This guy will probably face the DP anyway so again not sure what he'd have to gain by lying. But more info will surely come to light at trial.