Random theory - Page 2 - Internet Poker

Two Plus Two Forums Online Poker Sites & Marketplaces Online Poker Sites Discussion of Poker Sites

Random theory

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 2 of 2

1 2

Page 2 of 2

1 2

03-11-2010 , 05:08 AM

#26

qpw

banned

Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 4,019

Quote:

Originally Posted by jondewalt

Thoughts??

You don't know much about poker.

Quote

03-11-2010 , 05:36 AM

#27

hepzebah

adept

Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 714

[QUOTE=jondewalt;17396747I can say after just a little bit I have won more money (due to higher stakes), and I care much more about the game and focus a lot harder than I was at lower stakesQUOTE]

You have answered your own questions.

Care more + focus more = win more

Quote

03-11-2010 , 07:35 AM

#28

Gary_Neville

veteran

Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 2,959

So OP claims that he is losing whilst getting in the money good, so his apparently conclusion is to move up and play against better players, getting in the money not as good, and.... win? I'm just gonna go and hypothesize that OP has absolutely no statistical foundations of any form in any way, either that or he's a ******.

Plz GTFO OP.

Quote

03-11-2010 , 09:21 AM

#29

Huggy

veteran

Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 2,922

Quote:

Originally Posted by AirmanSpecial

Bout tree FIDDY

Obviously.

Quote

03-11-2010 , 09:46 AM

#30

tk1133

veteran

Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 2,221

OP, havent read the responses yet, but I will tell you that I am a low-midstakes player, but if I only have 30 dollars in my PS account, I will play a 27.50 9 man turbo sng before I play a 6.60 or 12 dollar. It goes against bankroll management, but I've argued this w/ my peers many of times...Results prove me right...trust me...

Quote

03-11-2010 , 01:41 PM

#31

corbinair

enthusiast

Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 66

I have noticed that it doesn't matter when going up. There are always going to be fish and suckouts on you. So take the "smarter" players + suckouts = deadmeat

Quote

03-11-2010 , 03:20 PM

#32

5thStreetHog

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 7,687

Quote:

Originally Posted by tk1133

Well, at least one player agrees with your theory OP and the results prove him right and the rest of the thinking world wrong, end thread imo.

Quote

03-11-2010 , 04:18 PM

#33

WOLVER1NE

veteran

Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 3,451

If u can't beat cheeseburger stakes, u sure as hell can't beat anything higher. Suckouts sucks, but keep getting it in with the best hand and it will turn around.

Quote

03-11-2010 , 04:22 PM

#34

DrMickHead

veteran

Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 2,947

OP are you all in when you're getting beat by these 2, 3, 4, 5 outters? Cause I hate to break it to you, but they hit just as often at higher stakes as they do at lower stakes.

Quote

03-11-2010 , 04:31 PM

#35

plaaynde

Poker Historian

Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 20,270

Quote:

Originally Posted by jondewalt

Do you guys think it becomes more advantageous to move up in stakes for the purpose of avoiding these moronic plays that constantly beat you?

No. You have got to get an in-built edge against "moronic" plays. Play with better cards than them and you will gain in the long run. Be glad you don´t meet real skill, that you would do higher up.