Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Potentially a really dumb question about Stars vs. FTP Potentially a really dumb question about Stars vs. FTP

01-11-2010 , 11:50 PM
So, in evaluating my play (using PT3's Money Won for Hands Played graph), on FTP I was dealing with a known quantity...every hand is shown down. On Stars, I guess on the regular tables they don't showdown losing hands in all-in situations.

Theoretically, this should have a serious impact on your Money Expected Won line, yes? You've won the pot, but the graph can't tell if you were ahead or behind when the money went in. Given that most of the time you win all-in showdowns you are ahead when the money went in, should this cause your blue line to remain substantially below where it would otherwise be?

Sorry this is really dumb...anyone that could explain how this works would be appreciated.
Potentially a really dumb question about Stars vs. FTP Quote
01-11-2010 , 11:53 PM
the hands are always shown in allin pots unless you are not sitting at the table (in the hand?)

this actually used to be the case at ongame, that even in allin pots the mucked hands weren't shown, so HM counted the hands as Ww/oSD. But that's not the case at stars.
Potentially a really dumb question about Stars vs. FTP Quote
01-11-2010 , 11:55 PM
Cool, thanks.
Potentially a really dumb question about Stars vs. FTP Quote
01-12-2010 , 12:08 AM
Stars does allow mucking an all-in loser. However, if you are dealt into the hand, the mucked cards are in your HH record.
Potentially a really dumb question about Stars vs. FTP Quote

      
m