Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011

01-27-2011 , 09:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonIrenicus
1.
This reminds me of the joy everyone had when stars introduced 20-50 bb tables. I wasn't happy about it then and now I hate this cap change even more.
So they just changed 20-50 to 20 cap.
Can someone detail what good that will do for the games? Won't the 20-50bb fish play 20bb cap now but harder to stack them in a single hand? Why are we assuming that some of them will migrate to 100bb?

2.
For the shortstack haters(me included): how is this hurting the shorties? can't they simply leave the table like before? This is just giving them an extra choice. If they notice their games get hurt by the change they can just make an agreement between them to simply leave after a double up like before even if they don't have to.

P.S : if PS made a separate tab for CAP then yea, I would get high hopes of fullstack games improving.
no one liked the way 20-50bb tables were introduced, i hated it at first and the games were actually better when they were 20-100bb, and the lobby is a mess right now, correct labelling at least makes it fair. i agree a separate tab for cap would be optimal, but the changes are for better. if fish wants to play cap tables, so be it. and your second statement doesn't make any sense.
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 09:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krax
would be soo soo funny if all the rec. players switched to cap games
they limit how much they can lose in a hand, avoid getting in to deep spots with pro players and dont have to sit with a bunch of nits and can actually get some action for their $$. i have high hopes tbh.
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 09:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonIrenicus

2.
For the shortstack haters(me included): how is this hurting the shorties?
Why the obsession with hurting shortstack players? The main complaints people had about them was 1) ratholing sucks and 2) using a smaller stack size to limit deeper players options is 'not fair.'

CAP addresses both of these issues handily, as there is now no advantage to ratholing, and no way to exploit having a shorter stack than the rest of the table.
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 09:24 AM
+1 for doing the same for plo
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 09:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ESKiMO-SiCKNE5S
they limit how much they can lose in a hand, avoid getting in to deep spots with pro players and dont have to sit with a bunch of nits and can actually get some action for their $$. i have high hopes tbh.
aaaaaaah, i can smell the desperation......
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 09:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by catuskid
CAP holdem should stay with the NL holdem games if PL holdem is staying there also.

CAP tables people wont be rat holing so the games wont be at the top of the lobby list, people cant moan about that now.

Public can decide fairly what they want to play now.
what stops the shorty regs to make a deal to leave table once they double up like before to keep their old system going if they see this new cap thing hurts them?
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 09:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gonira
aaaaaaah, i can smell the desperation......
ive played about 10 nlhe hands this year out of the 136k hands ive played so you should probably go get your nose tested at a doctor. im just pumped that cap games give me a legit option.

we shall see how things unfold midstacker.....
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 09:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gonira
no one liked the way 20-50bb tables were introduced, i hated it at first and the games were actually better when they were 20-100bb, and the lobby is a mess right now, correct labelling at least makes it fair. i agree a separate tab for cap would be optimal, but the changes are for better. if fish wants to play cap tables, so be it. and your second statement doesn't make any sense.
Everyone hated it?
Read it again:
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/28...tables-720944/
It's the same reaction you see now. I really really hope I am wrong on this as I see I am the only one who hates the change. I hope in 1-2 months you'll tell me "I told you so!" instead of me telling you that.
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 09:38 AM
40-100BB for HUNL, No 25nl (rake is sick)

Then ur the best again PS.

Im so sick of getting the 20 bb stacks on my HU tables, i will never play them.
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 09:45 AM
o m g and im so behind pace of elite. fml. this is amazing change
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 09:47 AM
Please change PLO structures to the same as nlhe. ASAP!
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 09:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaperWalls
40-100BB for HUNL
this^ + a vertical table option plz

Quote:
Originally Posted by subs
omgomgomgomgomgomgomgomg wooooooooooooooooooooooo
+1
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 09:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonIrenicus
Everyone hated it?
Read it again:
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/28...tables-720944/
It's the same reaction you see now. I really really hope I am wrong on this as I see I am the only one who hates the change. I hope in 1-2 months you'll tell me "I told you so!" instead of me telling you that.
nah, won't read it again. but i absolutely hated it from day one and i remember a lot of people concerned that 50bb maximum buy-in would be too much.

don't get me wrong, jon. of course it's far from perfect. i'd like if all shortstackers get cancer and die too, but they're pokerstars costumers that will never be overlooked in a change like this. at least they don't have an inherent unfair advantage with their shallow stacks anymore, everyone is the same at cap tables.

and i don't believe the majority of fish will be too much attracted by cap tables, when they try to shove the rest of their stack and realize they can't, they will probably think "wtf" and go to a regular table. cap is not the game they play in their home games and casinos.
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 09:51 AM
well done stars looks like you will get the majority of my business again
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 09:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonIrenicus
what stops the shorty regs to make a deal to leave table once they double up like before to keep their old system going if they see this new cap thing hurts them?
The conspiracy picture was exactly right. nothing stops the deep stack regs from making the same deals either.

I think you are going to see alot of people enjoy playing 20bb CAP btw and what are you going to do then, force the market to play deep stack at gun point ?

Things evolve, poker has changed.
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 09:58 AM
Deleting the 20bb-50bb tables is the worst decision Poker Stars has ever made. This is going to make thousands of players generate much less rake (many of them will just stop playing at Poker Stars). And also, there were thousands of players that had plans to reach a certain amount of VPP for this year and now they won't be able to do it. Hundreds of them even going for Supernova Elite, like me.

The solution wasn't removing those games, but just adding 20bb cap tables. Removing options is always bad. Poker Stars should give more options to their players, so it's more probable that they find something they like, and therefore generate rake. Changing one kind of table for this one (20bb cap) in practice will just make it impossible to play shortstacked at many tables, hurting lots of players, and making the poker room lose hundreds of millions of dollars.

Just to make happy some 2+2 users (the vast majority of them don't even play much, just whine, whine and whine here) you, Poker Stars, have made your worst decision ever. You are going to regret doing this.
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 10:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vedast
Deleting the 20bb-50bb tables is the worst decision Poker Stars has ever made. This is going to make thousands of players generate much less rake (many of them will just stop playing at Poker Stars). And also, there were thousands of players that had plans to reach a certain amount of VPP for this year and now they won't be able to do it. Hundreds of them even going for Supernova Elite, like me.

The solution wasn't removing those games, but just adding 20bb cap tables. Removing options is always bad. Poker Stars should give more options to their players, so it's more probable that they find something they like, and therefore generate rake. Changing one kind of table for this one (20bb cap) in practice will just make it impossible to play shortstacked at many tables, hurting lots of players, and making the poker room lose hundreds of millions of dollars.

Just to make happy some 2+2 users (the vast majority of them don't even play much, just whine, whine and whine here) you, Poker Stars, have made your worst decision ever. You are going to regret doing this.
So much for a big perspective!

Healty games >good for long term> more rake
20-50>not healthy> bad for long term.

GJ Stars, even tough u didnt have a choce cuz of FTP..
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 10:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vedast
Deleting the 20bb-50bb tables is the worst decision Poker Stars has ever made. This is going to make thousands of players generate much less rake (many of them will just stop playing at Poker Stars). And also, there were thousands of players that had plans to reach a certain amount of VPP for this year and now they won't be able to do it. Hundreds of them even going for Supernova Elite, like me.

The solution wasn't removing those games, but just adding 20bb cap tables. Removing options is always bad. Poker Stars should give more options to their players, so it's more probable that they find something they like, and therefore generate rake. Changing one kind of table for this one (20bb cap) in practice will just make it impossible to play shortstacked at many tables, hurting lots of players, and making the poker room lose hundreds of millions of dollars.

Just to make happy some 2+2 users (the vast majority of them don't even play much, just whine, whine and whine here) you, Poker Stars, have made your worst decision ever. You are going to regret doing this.
aaaahhhh, now i can smell it indeed
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 10:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Navire
Plz do it Stars, i always wanted to play heads up cash but dont have the BR for 50nl
+ PLUS A MIRRON!
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 10:10 AM
I'm a FT reg. You'll be seeing some more of me come Feb. Excellent change.
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 10:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gonira
i'd like if all shortstackers get cancer and die too
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gonira
aaaahhhh, now i can smell it indeed
Shortstackers must be owning you all day long to hate them so much.
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 10:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vedast
This is going to make thousands of players generate much less rake (many of them will just stop playing at Poker Stars). And also, there were thousands of players that had plans to reach a certain amount of VPP for this year and now they won't be able to do it. Hundreds of them even going for Supernova Elite, like me.
Relax man. I've played a ton of hands at NL50 20-50bb, and at NL50 20bb CAP.

At CAP, I get a higher win rate (I never have to give up position on a fish due to stack size considerations), more VPP per hand (CAP games are, for now at least, looser than their 20-50 counterpart), and more hands per hour (no need to leave and rejoin).

I personally don't think VPP should be your driving concern here, but if it is, I assure you this announcement is all upside for you.
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 10:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleFly
I'm a FT reg. You'll be seeing some more of me come Feb. Excellent change.
+1
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 10:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by c4211157
why let someone buy in for only 40bb on a normal table?
so the fishies still come play (and thats pretty standard for B&M too, 40bb min to whatever the max is)
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 10:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by c4211157
why let someone buy in for only 40bb on a normal table?
you want fish to play as high as possible right?
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote

      
m