Pokerstars going to start "Zoom" Poker soon? - update(Feb24) Zoom Beta test released - Page 52 - Internet Poker

Two Plus Two Forums Online Poker Sites & Marketplaces Online Poker Sites Discussion of Poker Sites

Pokerstars going to start "Zoom" Poker soon? - update(Feb24) Zoom Beta test released

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 52 of 138

First

2 32 42 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 62 72 102

Last

Page 52 of 138

First

2 32 42 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 62 72 102

Last

03-11-2012 , 04:59 PM

#1276

ThePressure

adept

Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 988

what were they stt?

Quote

03-11-2012 , 05:57 PM

#1277

HurtK

grinder

Join Date: Dec 2011 Posts: 537

Quote:

Originally Posted by bookish

Thinking of HUDs, HEM does not support zoom yet, PT4 does - but is not publicly available.

For those of you with a PT4 beta license zoom will be a goldmine for a while.

source?

Quote

03-11-2012 , 06:13 PM

#1278

andyg2001

veteran

Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 2,905

Quote:

Originally Posted by HurtK

source?

Here is an article on it. I can also confirm I got an update of PT4 beta which says it has a Zoom HUD. I can’t test it on the .net site because they don’t seem to have hand histories.

http://pokerfuse.com/news/media-and-...poker-support/

Quote

03-11-2012 , 06:15 PM

#1279

Hood

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 6,895

Quote:

Originally Posted by dadude77

http://pokerfuse.com/news/poker-room...ker-next-week/

Quote:

Originally Posted by ROM Amnesty

Doesn't that site just read this thread and dress it up to look like it has original and breaking news?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bobo Fett

Yeah, I LOLed at linking that article, which is basically a summary of the update PS gave us in this very thread.

Co-editor of that site here

I don't think "dressed up to look like it has original and breaking news" is fair or accurate; we received the info at the same time this thread does, it doesn't say it's original or breaking, and it links to this thread to for more information (we are pretty anal about linking to sources or further reading), and the text of the article does say it was a public announcement.

[small]And also we were the first to officially report on the name 'zoom poker' and that really was exclusive

[/small]

Quote

03-11-2012 , 06:44 PM

#1280

hypergeometry

adept

Join Date: May 2011 Posts: 742

Sometimes the Fast Fold check box doesn't appear. Someone else experiment the same bug ?

(In pokerstars.net)

Quote

03-11-2012 , 08:37 PM

#1281

Furo86

adept

Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 887

Quote:

Originally Posted by andyg2001

totally works, I tried it in the test client

Quote

03-11-2012 , 09:05 PM

#1282

Super Hiro

banned

Join Date: May 2011 Posts: 105

Quote:

Originally Posted by PokerStars Stefan

As we are nearing launch, we wanted to get feedback from players who have tried the different animation settings as to which one they prefer from the three options -- Fade, Slide, or Flip.

Thanks!

I'm hoping the players can choose which they prefer. I found slide makes me feel ill. Fade is my favourite but i'm sure everyone is different. I hope you aren't only going to give players one option. That would suck! (unless the option is fade)

Quote

03-11-2012 , 09:28 PM

#1283

MagicMurderBean

banned

Join Date: Jun 2011 Posts: 743

Quote:

Originally Posted by rzweig

Can we expect there to be CAP zoom tables?

**** that, NO TO CAP. Don't need to split the player base even further. Go play dummy poker somewhere else imo.

Quote

03-11-2012 , 09:33 PM

#1284

Maso777

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 6,961

Quote:

Originally Posted by von7thal

I already suggested to them to put that number of tables a bit higher.

Terrible idea

Quote

03-11-2012 , 09:35 PM

#1285

MagicMurderBean

banned

Join Date: Jun 2011 Posts: 743

What's the table number now, 4? imo 4 should be maximum.. couldn't be bothered with a bunch of spanish shortstackers slowin **** down sittin with 8 or something stupid.

spanish shortstackers burn in hell.

+ russian shorts. ****ing commie poker.

Quote

03-11-2012 , 09:55 PM

#1286

andyg2001

veteran

Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 2,905

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicMurderBean

There probobly won't be any 4max games in Zoom. The 4max game was just a staff test game on the test site. The real play will all be 6max and 9max, and the fine.

Quote

03-11-2012 , 10:32 PM

#1287

tzwien

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 5,267

I'm ok with people playing more than 4 tables if the minimum buyin is at least 40bbs. If they want to play 8% of hands and play like ****, I'll be fine owning them 24/7.

Having a 6 table max would seem better than 4 to me. What is the minimum buyin btw? It's been so long since I played Rush that I forgot what they had. I thought it was 40bbs. That seems best.

Quote

03-11-2012 , 11:52 PM

#1288

andyg2001

veteran

Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 2,905

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicMurderBean

Guess I misinterpreted the comment. 4 is the max tables you can play at least in one pool.

Quote

03-11-2012 , 11:58 PM

#1289

andyg2001

veteran

Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 2,905

Quote:

Originally Posted by tzwien

In Rush games Marc Karam used to play 12 tables across 3 limits, and was one of the loosest regs in the game. Played a Lag style.

Quote

03-12-2012 , 02:18 AM

#1290

SwedishAggroMonkey

banned

Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 78

WE DEMAND ZOOM DONKAMENTS

Quote

03-12-2012 , 03:49 AM

#1291

Sharkament

grinder

Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 482

Quote:

Originally Posted by andyg2001

There probobly won't be any 4max games in Zoom. The 4max game was just a staff test game on the test site. The real play will all be 6max and 9max, and the fine.

He doesnt say anything about 4max or 6max.. he's talking about max tables to play rush

Quote

03-12-2012 , 03:50 AM

#1292

Sharkament

grinder

Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 482

Quote:

Originally Posted by tzwien

50bbs is best imo. Rush had 40bbs and Stars should def take that as the bare minimum.. 30bbs or less and it will be russian and spanish shortstack invested (which it already is with 40bbs minimum)

Quote

03-12-2012 , 05:05 AM

#1293

enprinte

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 4,095

Just to speculate - do most people think its going to be released sometime this week? (Before micro millions promo).

Quote

03-12-2012 , 05:16 AM

#1294

bookish

adept

Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 752

Quote:

Originally Posted by Furo86

totally works, I tried it in the test client

That's what I figured. Doesn't seem reasonable to me that a small (unknown) number of players will have access to a HUD, whilst the rest won't.

I've no problem if nobody has a HUD or if everyone has (access to) one - that's another discussion, but I'm not sure I want to play on such an uneven playing field.

Quote

03-12-2012 , 05:22 AM

#1295

bookish

adept

Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 752

Quote:

Originally Posted by tzwien

I'm ok with people playing more than 4 tables if the minimum buyin is at least 40bbs.

Min buy-in and number of tables is pretty unrelated. Both issues.

Quote:

Originally Posted by tzwien

Having a 6 table max would seem better than 4 to me.

The great thing about RUSH was the speed of it. Limiting the number of players to 4 allowed people to still get in over 1000 hands pretty easily at a single limit (Full Ring), but prevented a number of people playing more tables than they could reasonably handle and slowing the games down.

If the games slow down there is no point playing Zoom.

Quote

03-12-2012 , 05:33 AM

#1296

Furo86

adept

Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 887

Quote:

Originally Posted by bookish

well, you should blame the guys of HM for delivering so bad in the past, it isn`t on pokerstars to restrict the HUD use because on developer isnt ready.

Im btw. pretty sure they will add zoom HUDs in PT3 when it will start if this your point (it`s sounds better if you can say "our new product was the first"

)

Quote

03-12-2012 , 05:48 AM

#1297

NoTurns

centurion

Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 104

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sharkament

50bbs is best imo. Rush had 40bbs and Stars should def take that as the bare minimum.. 30bbs or less and it will be russian and spanish shortstack invested (which it already is with 40bbs minimum)

Ill say it a gain, fixed buyin amounts and problem is solved. Everybody buys in for 100bb, no more no less. Really, this should be the standard in poker cash games. Same for deep and cap tables, everybody buys in for the same amount.

Quote

03-12-2012 , 06:04 AM

#1298

bookish

adept

Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 752

Quote:

Originally Posted by Furo86

well, you should blame the guys of HM for delivering so bad in the past, it isn`t on pokerstars to restrict the HUD use because on developer isnt ready.

The problem arises really because PT have (at the moment) released the HUD only to those people with a Beta license. Nothing to do with HEM.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Furo86

Im btw. pretty sure they will add zoom HUDs in PT3 when it will start

They may; I don't know. If they were in a position to release PT4 they'd probably keep it for PT4 only to encourage upgrades. I'd imagine almost all their developers are working on PT4 bug-fixes, so they may not have the bandwidth to add features to PT3 even if they wanted to.

Quote

03-12-2012 , 06:32 AM

#1299

tzwien

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 5,267

Quote:

Originally Posted by bookish

Min buy-in and number of tables is pretty unrelated. Both issues.

The great thing about RUSH was the speed of it. Limiting the number of players to 4 allowed people to still get in over 1000 hands pretty easily at a single limit (Full Ring), but prevented a number of people playing more tables than they could reasonably handle and slowing the games down.

If the games slow down there is no point playing Zoom.

RUSH was flawed with its pre-flop timer. If you give everyone a 5 second clock pf and 10 post-flop, I don't see why a 6 table max would slow anything down. It'd be significantly faster than RUSH was.

Quote

03-12-2012 , 07:31 AM

#1300

pokerbiker

veteran

Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 2,589

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sharkament

50bbs is best imo. Rush had 40bbs and Stars should def take that as the bare minimum.. 30bbs or less and it will be russian and spanish shortstack invested (which it already is with 40bbs minimum)

i am just wondering, is the minimum buyin really that relevant?

when u leave and get back to zoom, do you start again with the minimum buyin or with the buyin you left?

Quote

Page 52 of 138

First

2 32 42 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 62 72 102

Last

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 52 of 138

First

2 32 42 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 62 72 102

Last