Quote:
Originally Posted by jspill
^ post suggests you haven't done enough reading on the subject, which you should aim to, as you're a good poster. W/C is unfair too, and comes with its own problems. W/C without compensation is well worth striking against. there are 100s of posts hammering out the math and analysing the bigger picture behind every rake method out there, i'd suggest searching by post for 'weighted contributed' and user name 'do it right'. protesting for compensation with W/C is the same thing as lowering the rake, and we're also protesting for lower rake, yes. microstakes rake, PLO, cap, everything will be addressed when the sitout forces negotiations from stars.
I read the thread and I still stay with my point. It isn't true that every reg is losing (I am not). I remember the same discussion when FTP switched to WC. We all know that it is just money grab. They don't do this to protect ecosystem. while I might be naive back then when FTP switched now I am not.
However if we want to find solution the best is to lower the rake. We won't get it all (be realistic). It won't be dealt with low rake.
As people mentioned here rake in Limit Games and CAP games make them unbeatrable pre rakeback. It is just ridiculous. Plo rake is 2. as big as holdem rake up to small stakes( at least there you hit the cap frequently).
Pokerstars still treat the regs the best (I know it might sound ******ed for most of you but Ongame/Ipoker don't even care about us).
There are 2 parts that want to make a profit,regs and company. So basically they has to resign from part of the profit and we too.
They also want to protect their profits+ we all want them to advertise as much as possible cause we all need fish to survive.
low rake>>>>>>dealt
It will be way better for long term quality of the games.