Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Party support 'satisfied there is no evidence of foul play' Party support 'satisfied there is no evidence of foul play'

11-26-2008 , 01:06 PM
This Solymar9 guy is a big fish in Highstakes Cashgames, that all makes no sense imo?
Party support 'satisfied there is no evidence of foul play' Quote
11-26-2008 , 02:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rainbow Warrior
Party indicating that they had sent a 'warning' to the offender would have been at least the minimum with future chat ban a possibility.

I do appreciate the sites with AUTO CHAT BAN in all bubble and near bubble situations.


Rainbow...
I agree a bubble chat ban would help (like on stars steps tournaments) or an 'all in' chat ban like on ftp.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wahoo3
This. There is nothing explicit about this at all, there is a line that is crossed by "let's check it down" but not by "limping". It'd be like penalizing a live player for saying "I call", the only difference is its not necessary to state your intent online, but that doesn't make it against the rules. I would call it a dirty angle-shoot but one that can only be remedied by taking away chat privileges during bubble/money, nothing else would be appropriate.
Its not like he announced his action in the previous 50 hands of the sng. It is pretty clear what is going on and some of the responses are pretty frustrating.

Agree w/ chat privileges comment

Quote:
Originally Posted by Da_Face
This Solymar9 guy is a big fish in Highstakes Cashgames, that all makes no sense imo?
He is a fish in sngs as well.

The problem is that they dont see any problem with this , or the more serious team cheating that surely occurs that I have identified with no results.
Party support 'satisfied there is no evidence of foul play' Quote
11-26-2008 , 04:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scotty_12
The problem is that they dont see any problem with this , or the more serious team cheating that surely occurs that I have identified with no results.
If there is more serious team cheating going on then why wouldn't you post that instead of a guy saying "limping"?

I mean I agree him saying "limping" is kind of weird and he should probably get a warning. But I think it would be better evidence to see this other "serious" cheating you're talking about.
Party support 'satisfied there is no evidence of foul play' Quote

      
m