Quote:
Originally Posted by ROM Amnesty
It wasn't a very long post warning of consequences if the proposed action went ahead. It was a very long post talking about loads of other stuff with a brief comment at the end warning mainly of consequences to anyone who caused incitement in chat. Their "right to take action based on the degree of disruption to [their] business" indicates that anyone who is simply sitting out at one table maximum should have very little, if any, action taken against them.
What would you think would happen? Even if he didnt write a warning you should know that if you want to hurt a business it is going to take action against. Or are you really that stupid that you dont understand that? You think they are just gonna watch your childish behvaiour ruining the game for people who are trying to play some poker?
It is common sense that they are going to do something about it. Many people knew this except the people who were protesting. Thats why they are so surprised now that they are banned, they dont know better.
So dont blame stars that you all ****ed up in the first place.
And take the bann as a lesson.