Quote:
Originally Posted by newschool
To play z pokerz?
Some guy I've never heard of? No.
Quote:
Originally Posted by newschool
YOU HAVE PROVIDED. Is the key statement IMO. But we could argue forever about each word in it. Like Bill Clinton asking for a definition and context for "as" when he was before congress for getting his BJ.
I wondered if you would try going down this road again - you are clearly misreading the clause.
Quote:
INTERTOPS reserves the right to verify Your identity and the fidelity of the information YOU HAVE SUPPLIED by making various security and ID checks.
The interpretation which you have chosen is that "you have supplied" relates to your identity. You don't supply your identity. Your identity is whatever it is. They reserve the right to verify your identity, and they reserve the right to verify the fidelity of the information you have supplied. They don't reserve the right to verify your identity you have supplied - that doesn't make sense. You can't supply them with an identity. If it said identification, you might have a leg to stand on here.
IOW, with better punctuation, it's:
Quote:
INTERTOPS reserves the right to verify Your identity, and the fidelity of the information YOU HAVE SUPPLIED, by making various security and ID checks.
Quote:
Originally Posted by newschool
edit: You never addressed the moneygram already verifying me thing.
Um, OK. Why would I? I don't see the relevance. One entity verifying your identity doesn't mean another one wouldn't want to do their own checks.