Quote:
Originally Posted by Synergistic Explosions
Hero's VIP program would have been superior to the VIP program that they are moving to next week. I wish we had the Hero option. Hero would crush Merge VIP programs if they were still in business. Everyone would be playing on Hero. I guess the other Merge skins use the old affiliate model that gives the affiliates 40% of the players net revenue so they can't afford to give the players much anymore. Stupid affiliates. I liked Hero's direct marketing approach much better. Just eliminate the affiliates so you don't have to give them 40% of the players net revenue. That money then could be given back to us in a decent VIP program, like Hero had already.
Stupid affiliates, they take all our rake just because we click on a banner on their website that signs us up to Merge. What an idiotic system that is in place. Take away benefits from players and keep giving all of the players hard earned money to the bums who plaster affiliates links on their websites. Insane!
Did I say affiliates are pond scum sucking low life illiterate hillbilly's?
Sometimes your posts are kind of crazy.
Any skin on Merge would've had to conform to the network's VIP program in some way. They wouldn't allow a skin to just offer something that crushes their own brands in value.
And your affiliate opinions are off. Other Merge skins had the same VIP as Hero and still had affiliates.
It's not a question of either or, and Hero took a non affiliate approach apparently and other skins took an affiliate approach. That is fine. If I ran a poker room I would probably start by taking Hero's approach. But clearly it is beyond the capacity of every poker room to successfully market to a large enough amount of players (otherwise they would not have affiliates around).
I corrected your mistaken posts about affiliates and how it works in the other thread, others did too, please stop repeating incorrect statements about how things work, it's just simply not true and you just have it out for other people it seems.
An example to my last sentence is that you were outraged that affiliates got "40% of the rake" until I corrected you on what revenue meant and that it often meant 20-25% in the old system, and that you were ignorant of the customer service needed to take care of players at times, the costs of promotions and the value that most good affiliates provide (videos, coaching, software, electronics, rake races and more). If an affiliate gets 10% of a player's rake after all expenses, they are working on high margins in this industry. Nobody is saying "poor me" about affiliates (or poker rooms), but to act like affiliates are taking 40% of rake, or even 20% of rake is completely incorrect.
You never acknowledged any of these points so I'm calling you out for the false and ignorant post that you've continued to repeat on this subject.