Quote:
Originally Posted by hitman4hire
I admire your honesty poker sites are about playing the software not poker
and if you happen to have a favourable account in regards to paying rake this helps to
I totally respect any opponent who "plays the software." One kept saying he folds every AK preflop since it always loses (after he folded I assume AK). I happily congratulated him on his system based play as I got no call for my reraise all in with AQ suited preflop.
He lost shortly later when his KJ lost to AK, but I told him not to veer from his beliefs as they will serve him well. He thanked me and said he would.
His ROI on sharkscope and OPR were both in the -50% range. Must be the site's fault.
We make fun of "rigtards" here, but the reality is the last thing we really want any of them to do is use logic or even watch that fairly interesting video that was just posted.
I never even ask rigtards to prove what they say that often (not like proof is really a big part of their claims anyway). I just find it amusing when some pick theories that are exactly opposite of other rigged theories, and some are very creative in using so many unrelated bits of data that it can be amusing watching them craft essentially a huge mixed rigged quilt. Look, the ace is in the same spot in 2 Omaha hands in a row, that proves it is rigged!!
That's mainly for entertainment purposes here. Rigtards in all forms are a vital contributing (in terms of $$$) part of the poker economy and the last thing we really need is for them to actually use things like logic, evidence and deductive reasoning.
Gut instinct, knowing when something is wrong and creating beliefs about things like deposit curses, action hands, super boom accounts, playing the software/not the odds are all beliefs I am happy to see others have at the tables.