Quote:
Originally Posted by Username^^
There is no way you can prove its rigged statisticly.
There are plenty of ways to analyze a database of hand histories to test the validity of the deal.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Username^^
I have one idea, but i dont have hand historys and tools to examine it.
Well, ok, there is no way you can analyze anything in terms of statistical significance.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Username^^
We could check MTTs on full tilt, and the percentages the big hands holds up depending on the stack sizes and against a players with more or less experience. And similar stuff. I think you could also put your ideas around here, and maybe someone will decide to do it some day :-).
Well, sort of sounds like you have a belief based on some bad luck or something. Keep in mind that we have seen both of these rigged theories put forward:
1) Big stacks win too many hands in tournaments
Main reason for this rigged belief:
Makes tournaments finish faster so more rake for the site
2) Small stacks win too many hands in tournaments
Main reason for this rigged belief:
Helps bad players who tend to have smaller stacks.
Odds are that both theories cannot both be true at the same time, however that does not stop both from having people who believe they are each absolutely true. They tend to not have databases of hands they can analyze as well. Go figure.