Quote:
Originally Posted by toltec444
Imagine if the money from your bank account is suddenly gone and the bank demands you to prove how someone could hack their software and rob the money, thats just ******.
Umm...
If the money in your bank account is suddenly gone, you could easily prove this with just your bank statements. You don't need to be an expert on software security, you just need to figure out how to log into your internet bank and where the print screen button is, or how to find your local bank office and ask a clerk for your bank statements.
If you believe that your Aces are being cracked 90% of the time, all you need to do is to request your hand histories and count manually for yourself. You will find that your perception is wrong. You don't need to be some sort of stat freak for that or even have a poker stat software.
The biggest problem isn't that the rigtards don't understand statistics, the biggest problem is that they continuously make ******ed claims
without backing it up using data that is already easily available to them.
The rigtards are not being asked to prove that the game is rigged, they are being asked to back their claims with anything more substantial (i.e. hard data of a significant sample size) than cherry picked hand histories, "I know it's rigged, I just know it", or various "it *could* certainly be rigged this way or that way" statements, referring to human nature (greed) or saying "anyone who doesn't believe it's rigged is ******ed" (if it's so freaking obvious it would be super easy for any intelligent person to come up with some suspicious looking stats) etc.
That's it, *some* hard data to back up your claims is all that is being asked for.