Quote:
Originally Posted by kmpk
Monteroy, are you really qualified to comment on this subject? All you ever seem to say is "they wouldn't do it" and "if they did it would be obvious".
People with extreme expertise in this area have gone into mind numbing, boring detail why it would not be possible or practical and that changes not a single mind either. Riggedologists still think they magically see undetectable patterns that rigorous statistical analysis cannot find.
I just mention the common sense aspect and have fun with paranoid people.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kmpk
Can you say with 100% certainty that the sites do not manipulate things in anyway?
I have said many times I can not prove that superbots or Lizard People do not exist. Similarly I cannot disprove the negative statement you are asking, because that is not how "proof" works.
I can say with 100% certainty that if any riggedologist every actually proved a single thing they claim is happening, I would be the first to support them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kmpk
I only ask because you seem a very strange person.
Lizard People effect.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kmpk
People come here with concerns and you instantly ridicule them, call them names and belittle them without anything substantial to back up your claims.
Usually I quote them so their words and ideas can speak for themselves. I praised the guy who said it was mafia from Russia and Israel for promoting unity between nations, so it's not all negative.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kmpk
If you are in a position to use facts and statistics to highlight your opinion why not use those facts and statistics.
Spadebidder and others have tried. Just look through this thread for dozens of those hopeless conversations they have had with facts and statistics and theory vs riggedologist "I knows what I sees" beliefs.
I don't try to pretend to be that nice to actually educate riggedologists.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kmpk
I assume that you have done a great deal of work yourself in order to come to your conclusions. I understand that this is your passion, it's nice that you have something in your life which you feel is this important, but I don't think your contributions really help.
I never claimed I ever tried to genuinely help riggedologists understand the flaws in their thinking, though often times there is genuine advice in my mocking posts.
Others have genuinely tried to help riggedologists by explaining their logic errors and reasoning flaws. Yeah, that worked.
I'll stick with the fun plan.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kmpk
There are thousands of people who will not play online because they feel it is rigged.
Tons of people will still not use banking machines. Some will not use banks.
People can be paranoid however they choose, that is their right.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kmpk
Because of these people and also for our own sakes we should be encouraging pokersites to open themselves up for regular inspections, maybe by a team put together on 2+2. Let them have an agreeable number of hand histories, from everyone, and audit them.
This is not a social service. If these beliefs were deep genuine major concerns for the market as a whole then the sites would makle it their number one issue to talk about and advertise.
Lots of new players like freerolls and free money more than RnG inspection teams.