I got a gold star at school once, does that count?

More appropriately, instead of wasting any more time here, as there are no real players in this thread right now, Ill let you wastes of cum,(like yourself), play with yourselves. You can lie to each other, wouldnt that be fun?

Define "real player".

Real Player - [ree-uhl pley-er] - noun

1. a moron that agrees with the lunatic ramblings of another moron

.

You forgot to quote the part of my post where I explained that you wouldnt answer the question because it would make you look even more stupid than usual.

Based on that quote, he has other things on his mind for now. Think jjj pretty much called it earlier.

blatantlyrigged - The games were much, much easier pre-UIGEA. Yes or no?

I have to say that anyone who calls all opposition as site promoters and affiliates is insane. Blatantlyrigged is a random fish who is taking his failure in OLP to an extreme level and accusing everyone who doesn't agree with him.

Sir, you will never win a dollar from poker even if you play in a live setting. Poker is not for crazies like you. Mental health is of primary importance in poker and your mental condition doesn't permit you to be left alone in the public.

You have 0 thinking ability, and not because you are a riggie, its coz your arguments and your posts in general are lame as it gets. I have never seen a anyone who has made 1300 posts about a topic without being able to convince even one person. All you have done is personal attacks without producing any proof in support of your arguments.

The first temptation you'd have after reading this would be to call me a site promoter/affiliate, without telling us why you think so. You sir, have tact and logical ability of a five year old. I am assuring you that you will never be able to do anything that requires thinking and creativity. If its still possible for ya, try going to college, you might learn a few live saving lessons.

+1

Wrong.

Keep going Blatantlyrigged - you have obviously got the shills rattled. They are spouting even more spiteful gibberish than usual.

Nice to finally see another riggie (I assume you are one though I don't recognize your user name) offering some support to that guy, all of the other riggies completely ignore him as if he is the black sheep of the riggie family. He certainly deserves better given his 50+ posts per day he provides!

I also agree that he does seem to rattle some of the shills, and the best solution for that is for all the shills to simply put him on ignore.

What you should do now is actively encourage the other riggies when they post to proudly and loudly support the blatantdude as that will greatly help strengthen your cause. They all ignore him, just look at the thread history and try to find any riggies that acknowledge him at all.

He really needs your help. He needs a person like you to help him get his fellow riggie support, are you up for that challenge? Yes or no?

As a reward, you and he can call me a shill/site defender/Lizard Person to your heart's content and I will not even argue the point.

All the best.

Ignoring him completely would negate some of the entertainment value of this thread!

The big tough guy went 6 hours without posting in this thread.

That's pretty impressive.

At least two online casinos use software that cheats craps players, two leading gambling statisticians say.

The software by BLR Technologies, based in Costa Rica, detects a player's bet and increases the chances of a losing roll, according to gambling consultant Michael Shackleford, known as the "Wizard of Odds," and Eliot Jacobson, operator of Jacobson Gaming, which audits and certifies casino games around the world.

Legends.com and World Wide Wagering (www.wager.dm) use the BLR software in their craps games, according to rating service SportsBookReview.com. A third operator, 5Dimes.com, said it dropped BLR after the studies were posted on Shackleford's WizardOfVegas.com site.

Rachel Miller, general manager of Legends, said the software used on her site plays fairly. She said the company has invested thousands of dollars in new random number generators to work with the BLR software. She said she could not agree or disagree with the Shackleford and Jacobson studies because they did not test the craps game at Legends.

"I guarantee that everything is perfect on our end," she said.

A spokeswoman for 5Dimes said the company had no comment beyond a statement to Shackleford's site that it had removed BLR software from its casinos.

"BLR was given ample time to address the concerns of (WizardOfVegas) forum members as well as our direct questions," the statement said. "No acceptable answers were given, so the casino platform was removed."

BLR and World Wide did not respond to phone and e-mail requests for comment.

Legends, licensed in Panama, and 5Dimes, based in Costa Rica, are among only five online sports books with an A-plus rating from SportsBookReview.com, which grades hundreds of sites for customer service, incentives and pricing. World Wide, licensed in Dominica, West Indies, has a B grade.

The complaint about the craps software surfaced last month in a WizardOfVegas player forum.

Norman Clem, 66, of Las Vegas said he had been playing craps at World Wide for about a year and was slightly ahead before he suddenly started losing.

"I thought I was just on a bad run. But it never stopped," he told Player's Advantage. He documented his play, recording each bet and each outcome in a spreadsheet. From May 14 to Aug. 27, he videotaped 3,200 rolls in which he bet "pass" or "don't pass," the simplest bets in craps.

Those bets should win almost 49 percent of the time. Clem said he won 856 times, about 27 percent.

Intrigued by Clem's postings, Shackleford played craps at 5Dimes, which was using BLR software at the time. He said he bet only the pass line, winning 81 times and losing 247.

"It would have been easier to win the Powerball two out of two times than to be as unlucky as I was," said Shackleford, who has helped design slot machines for Internet casinos.

Jacobson said he devised a test to see whether the software "would really misbehave." With his approach, he would win something unless a seven came on the next roll.

"Suddenly, it produced a lot of sevens," he said. In 74 chances, a seven came up 41 times, or more than once in every two rolls; with fair dice, a seven comes up an average of once every six rolls.

"Thousands of people have been ripped off by this software," Jacobson said.

Clem said World Wide refunded his losses.

"It's obvious I was cheated, so what were they going to do?" he said.

Shackleford said 5Dimes refunded his losses. It's unclear whether others received refunds.

Jacobson said BLR also makes software for online blackjack, video poker, roulette and slots, but he does not know of any research into those.

Legends, World Wide and 5Dimes are primarily sports books, but offer casino games as another gambling attraction. Miller said less than 10 percent of Legends' 7,500 active gamblers use the casino.

She said Legends continues to use BLR, in part, because the software works so well with the site's main function of handling sports bets.

The United States does not license or regulate online gambling. Federal law prohibits American gamblers from collecting winnings from Internet casinos.

The federal government's April 15 crackdown on Full Tilt Poker, PokerStars and Ultimate Bet was based on accusations that they violated U.S. banking law.

Although those sites were shut down in the United States, 300 offshore companies continue to offer online gambling to U.S. players, according to the American Gaming Association, an industry group.

Shackleford and Jacobson said the BLR case should hasten the move toward U.S. regulation of online gambling.

"It only goes to show that when there's no regulation, there's nothing to stop these types of things from happening," Shackleford said.

"This kind of issue just shows how much (regulation is) needed," Jacobson said. "People are going to continue to gamble at these sites. There are still thieves and crooks creating crooked software."


Read more: Studies say software cheats players at 2 online casinos - Pittsburgh Tribune-Review http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pitt...#ixzz1eIzGtuGn

+1000000000

The theory is that online poker can be rigged, and dont forget that there are many ways to rig the game. I never said online poker were definately rigged, an even though I think so I cant say that because I dont have any proof. I just explain why I think so before some guys come and call all types of rigging either impossible, unprofitable or detectable. They say that "online poker is not rigged" but dont have the arguments to back that up.

No, you created your own rigging theory and pointed out the problems in it.

And who do you think the "other people" are? Normal people who just have an interest in this?

Do you understand how a pokereconomy works?

Do you understand what evening the playing field even mean?

I will show you a simple example where 6 players are playing a 50$ sitngo.

This is their stats: Money balance/skill level in ROI

1. 450$/-4% ROI
2. 1600$/+7% ROI
3. 835$/-10% ROI
4. 34500$/+2% ROI
5. 245$/+3% ROI
6. 9500$/+3% ROI

Places paid: 1 = 200$ and 2 = 100$

What outcome of the SnG do you think is best for the site hosting it based on this information? If you ran the site, who would you want first and second?

Lets say player 1 is a new player on the site who recently deposited 500$. He plays and plays but never peaks his initial deposit and are basically just degenrating before eventually busto. How likely do you think he is to make another deposit now?

Imagine he runs his money up to 1500 instead, before he starts to lose it. When he goes busto, how likely do you think he is to make another deposit in this case? Or if you were running the site: Which of the two scenarios would you rather happened to the new player?

Hey, I rattle too right? Would be cool if you guys could start ignoring as well. You have already explained so many times how delusional and paranoid I am so its only fair that you would ignore such a person.

You at least try, even though most of your theories are just duplicates of your other theories that get shot down. I kind of chuckled when one stats guy after another told you that your theories were invalid and all you did was tweak them in an insignificant way and ask again.

Eventually when they gave up and stopped replying you interpreted that as them agreeing with your theories. That was pretty damn entertaining.

If I created a riggie gimmick account, I would actually try to do what you are genuinely doing. If you are a gimmick then you get my praise for a job well done.

Here are some comments/questions that you can avoid

Go to this forum

http://forums.holdemmanager.com/manager-general/

Post any specific theory you can think of and they can tell you how you can test it for your hands (assuming you use Holdem Manager which I realize most riggies are afraid of) in under a minute.

Go nuts and think of as many theories as you like, and as long as they are not flaky like "more bad beats when the weather is cloudy" you will be able to test for it. New player boomswitches? No problem, very easy to test by dates of the hands. Weak opponents beating you on the rivers too much? No problem, easy to identify who the biggest losers are in your database and then bring up all hands against them and filter them for any test you like.

The tools to test all your beliefs are right there and you can even get a free trial! Somehow I doubt that will convince you



Do you have any idea how many sit and gos and tournaments run every day? We have guys that can play 1,000 in a good day.

How exactly are you going to program them all to have specific people win in the way you want? How are you going to have the players play in exactly the way you want? If they do not are you going to change the rig on the fly, for tens of thousands of tournaments daily with different combinations of people in each one?

You also have to do this without being caught either by an outsider or insider.

Do you have any idea of the scale of this project?


Tell you what, I will give you a simpler one. That blatantdude desperately needs a friend/supporter and I imagine that badbeatbandit guy is a hit and run poster, so how about you step up to the plate and quote him and openly support him every chance you get. He really could use support from a poster like you, so don't you think it would be the right thing to do to follow him?

All the best.

Pretty much everything in the post you quoted has been debunked numerous times.

Saying +1, or +10000000000000000000000000000 has no effect on the validity of the statements being made.

Some of these affiliates,coaches, site promoters for the most part are pathological liars.
They have an obsession with my posts and respond to them in some way faithfully. However, they have me on "ignore".
Come on, bro, THINK about that.

Debunked by liars, poker coaches, site promoters? So what! What he said is 100% truth.
What you say is meaningless, and thats being nice.

In case this was overlooked, lets have another look, shall we?

Making a claim does not make a claim factual or true.

Do you not understand this?

Like when someone claims there is no evidence that OLP is rigged/manipulated?
Sure do, thank you! You actually made sense!
Just wondering, are you from Cleveland?