Fair enough, but explain why 888 and PP get decent reviews and non one talks about the RNG, or rarely talk about the RNG.

Yet on the same site with equally the same chance and no bias, over 90% of I_poker reviews talk about a rigged RNG.

Enlighten me.

NO. Hes a ****ing douchebag, hes seen the posts, dont like wasting a lot of time with site promoters, total waste.

Please use the quote function, makes it much easier to reply to you


not much further. What conclusions can you draw that helps determine if there is a rig going on?

There has been a lot of discussion about that in the past. Just because you've either forgotten or didn't bother to read the whole thread doesn't mean there is deafening silence.

This is where you not having read the thread becomes a problem. You weren't here when the stats guys discussed this in detail. I don't know what you mean by affected the card distribution but not affectd the stats. Please elaborate.

It's the most important factor. If its happening it will leave a trail in the HHs. If the rig is not reflected in the HHs there is no reason to suspect it is going on.

how could it be otherwise?

I can assure you that every single poker site online to every single brick and mortar casino has been accused endlessly of being rigged by emotional irrational players. Your statement about no one questioning the deals at PP are false and merely a product of the small sample size of opinions youve apparently read and your own personal bias.

This doesnt mean that no poker games have been rigged. The main flaw with your original post is that you put stock in selective memory and emotions while ignoring the only thing that is accurate, the facts. We will never prove a site is rigged using your strategy. We will and have proven games are being cheated or manipulated by both other players and sites using the real data which doesnt ever lie.

No, the site is one site with reviews, no bias.

There are a very small % of posts about the RNG at PP and 88.com, decent sample.

Over 90% of I-Poker reviews, on the same site with the same bias discuss the rigged RNG.

Explain it.

There's a tool on the link below that will allow you to test your HH.

Please use it.

http://www.ispokerrigged.com/

You are asking the same question to which I just gave a detailed and clear explanation. Im not sure typing it again will help you understand it any better. Id suggest rereading my post again. Its clear you didnt understand because your very first sentence above is already inaccurate regarding what I actually said.

He did explain it. You have a very flawed approach to rational thinking, and it shows in every post. Trying to explain people who do not grasp basic logic is kind of a pointless, endless exercise because , well, they don't think in a logical manner.

You have not seen as many PP riggie posts so you think that proves something, when it proves nothing, however if it makes you more comfortable playing there then do just that.

If you are Convinced that a site is "rigged" then do one of two things! Quit playing there and go where you are comfortable, OR try to figure out a system to beat the "rigging" like always folding a set to a flush draw or always folding KK preflop to avoid the "rigged " ACE that will "always" come or some other goofy stuff! I suggest the 1st course of action! Please!

They believe it can be otherwise. Pretty simple.

Welcome to debating believers.

Massive hands with coolers actually reduce site rake.
This is wrong, you have your own hole card info.

If other players are getting certain cards more than they should (because of some nefarious arrangement) then you must get those cards less often.

If you're able to notice this from simple human observation and memory, the statistical consequences would be very obvious.

Here's a simple demonstration of this:

1) How many coolers and massive hands do you see every 100 hands?

2) How many coolers and massive hands should you see every 100 hands?
Human instincts are terrible at randomness, and your belief that instinct is useful here is further evidence of your fundamental misunderstanding of both randomness and human instincts.

In short, our brains are hard wired to identify patterns quickly, and rely upon those judgements. If our forebears saw a lion running quickly towards us, they needed to very quickly identify it as a threat, plot a likely path of the lion, and get out of the way... and if they didn't identify this pattern, they'd die pretty quickly. Consequently, the only people alive today are the descendants of people who were good at identifying patterns.


Whether or not something is popular has no relationship to whether or not it is true.

The fact that there are a lot of people who believe in God is not evidence that there is (or is not) a god. It is simply evidence that a lot of people feel that way.

If most people thought that 1+1 = 3, that wouldn't make it correct. It would just make a lot of people wrong in their belief.

When discussing objective facts (such as whether or not something is genuinely random) popularity and opinion polls are useless.

There used to be a review on there that falsely claimed to be written by me on the issue of shuffling at PokerStars. It was a lie. Some people lie. Some people are wrong. Both of those situations have no bearing on the objective fact of this issue.

Why should FT rig their games? They obviously found a much easier way .. just take it out of the player accounts directly (and pray you get enough fresh deposits so nobody notices).

Too many. Too many - n.

In before merge? This guy will fit in nicely.

Worthless.

...

Thank you, your honesty is appreciated.

I cannot comment on "the big 3" as u I live and play from the UK. Tbh, I have always been nervous about something like BF and have therefore never deposited on these sites.

Note to BR - Do you want to enter this debate and answer my direct question as has already been done?

So what your are saying is, you can be bothered to respond but not be bothered to link to anything of substance you have typed before.

Okay, for someone Blatantly******ed I guess that makes sense.

At least enter into some sort of debate as JJ is willing to do or GTFO

The world certainly would be a better place if your kind GTFO.
Anyway, merge network has many different skins. Sportsbook.com, playersonly, lock poker, etc. The cards come down the same on each site. You will see mr. A if you are playing on lock poker or if youre playing on playersonly.
I feel you ignorance prevents me from having any "how they manipulate the deal" discussions. You have your faith based belief which will not change.

have another beer ...then You will be able to do anything!

Nope Im thinking the shilltards are ignoring the heads up challenge?.....come on
wiki 1 time heads up with you or your other account ...I dont care ......Your real account dont have bad stats (just wanted you to know that)...So quit hiding behind your fake account!

Heads up for 1 month ban?....wiki?

wiki ....You could never lose to a paranoid riggy could you.... We are all losers ....Just ask your account....Lol

The game has passed me byyyyyyy........Where is your balls boy?

[QUOTE=joker15801;27953273]wiki ....You could never lose to a paranoid riggy could you.... We are all losers ....Just ask your other account....Lol

The game has passed me byyyyyyy........Where is your balls boy

I'll play you headsup for real money.

Yeah, I will also. I prefer we do both NL and Omaha (one or both varieties) as well for a change of pace. Razz as well if you like. 27 triple draw also is fine.

Let me know.

If you just are doing it to mess with Wiki say so and I will step aside, though he will never play you.