Riggies would simply say they change the data in time for the studies or that the companies doing the studies are in on it.

What do you suggest then?

This classic post coming from one of the many site promoters clogging up this thread. Their purpose in his is to lie and B.S. people on how fair the deal is in OLP, all the while trying to sucker ignorant kids into becoming part on the scam that is OLP.

Bingo_fool you have search engine right.There have also been other studies that are also ITT.
In regards to in my HH of course i have examples of 4.5% top hand distributions going to showdown.But my sample size may not be big enough and the full HH are not available IE AA vs KK vs 1010 the pp10s may have been folded pre by a competent player.

Please post the link.

When there are fully transparent audits we should discuss then not just pull out hypothetical questions.

Seek and you will find.
Also dont forget Ed Millers take at notedpokerauthority

There have been several transparent audits, both from players and outside companies. Riggies ignore all those studies. Why do you think your idea of a study would change their faith in believing it is rigged? Some of the riggies have openly said that even when the US legislates it they think the US government will be involved in the rigging. What do you say to them?

There's a study with evidence, but I don't want to tell you what study, what university performed it, or where you can find it. Use a search engine and try to find it yourself.

ken******: The clue is in the name, yes?

So you know they've been dealt too often even though they've been folded by other players? Thats clever of you.

You said 'flops are rarely missed' so that will show up in your hand histories won't it? Or don't you see flops?

I assume you are ignoring my questions about the 'study' because you don't know the answers. You don't know the answers because the information isn't available. The information isn't available because it was made up by some rigtard idiot.

Its in this thread.
Bravo darkus
player audits are not done by software professionals.
I have no clue about car mechanics would you like me to service your car.
Must adjourn for food.

OK - I've searched - not only this forum. The text is posted in a lot of places, and never attributed. It's a classic repeat-it-lots-of-times-and-it-becomes-true scam.

Such a shame there's no evidence.

Is "bollocks" an allowed word here?

If the profanity filter doesn't zap it you should be fine.

And, it is very apposite.

gtfo scamster.

Wondering if I should report the "university study" allegation as potentially libelous?

Well said, so true.

So you know they've been dealt too often even though they've been folded by other players? Thats clever of you.

So much dumb i refuse to repsond to someone with the reading comprehension
of a 5 year old.

Keywords:fulltiltpoker statistical random.

Gooday.
To much dumbness in the spam people cant use search engines or read.

Allowed? It's essential.

Are you idiots going to keep posting "so true" and "well done" and "great post" in response to each other's gibberish?

Yes they are. I think that's the point of this thread. It's kind of a care in the community service to keep them off the streets and away from our children and pets.

Coming from someone who can't use a simple quote function.

You, me and everybody else knows the 'study' is just made up by a rigtard. A rigtard who, by the way, has at least tried to make an effort which is more than can be said for you.

Edit: googling it just brings up a load or moronic, bitter, rigtard bad beat blogs. Did the university manage to telepathically publish the study directly into the brain of a rigtard through the tin foil hat?

Why don't you publish the original source or admit it is almost certainly nonsense?

Monteroy said a while back hes still real busy with his coaching business even after the FTP shutdown news just recently. Doesnt look that way to me, since hes spending more time than usual in here "whilst"(like how I used a shill word), spreading his B.S. trying to sucker ignorants into joining the OLP scam. Noticed a huge shill count in here also, spreading their lies as well.
Could it be they are losing business? Pity. LOL

You should try using different colour text to emphasise the rationality of your argument.

[QUOTE=Monteroy;27417462]Unlikely you will see other riggies (even the spam riggies) indicate they believe him about his tournament claims, they may even think he is a fake at this point trying to lure them into believing him with false claims.

Still, if he as an Amercian managed to final table 3 majors in a week with I assume a VPN and help from associates with accounts from other countries and he can back up that claim, he certainly will get some praise (before the accounts get closed).

I still put the cure for cancer as having a better chance.




Regardless of the gimmick chances here (wonder if the riggies will believe this account), I always admire people embracing their inner "Ogre"

"EMBRACING THEIR INNER OGRE" LOL ROFLMAO ...SO SOPHISTICATED WRITINGS LOL...WOULD YOU LIKE A SPOT OF TEA WITH THE ROYALS WHEN THEY ARRIVE ? WHAT A ****ING NERD !

Why can't rigtards learn to quote?

This ****** train is really flying off the tracks lately.