You guys needs to learn how to multiquote.

I haven't "jumped on the bandwagon", I've been laughing at you from the start, i'm just one of the few who havent been accused of "shilling" (yet).

And you havent "answered" anything, you are just randomly posting anything from the internet that you think supports your ranting. Most people agree that rigging is probably possible (though not economically feasible or practical) and everyone agrees online poker should be regulated. If this is all you're trying to say, you've done it, well done.

If you're also trying trying illustrate that the deal is rigged, you need to trawl the internet for some more random opinions and pointless hand histories and post as many of them as possible, preferbaly with a smug sense of satisfaction to make sure we understand

No, I want to see just how fast we can grow this thread.

What was inadvertant was you evident belief that you could come on here and mention your criminality and no one would care.

It just shows that you have no moral compass whatsoever.

But surely you can pay the site back with the money RealDeal pay you to shill on this site?

To get out of a hole, first stop digging.

lol donkaments. Full tilt is rigged.

If you owe them money and don't intend to pay it's stealing.

They want the money you took from them would be my guess.

Am new to the forum and just browsing but have to say thankyou for this post as it made me cress up with laughter.

Its all rigged, rigged rigged rigged.The proof will come within 2 years and you will be shocked when you see who leaks it! It will be a blockbuster and all accounts on all sites will freeze and disappear...more to follow

Mr. TK Sir,

This is without a doubt your best post. I appreciate your spelling out your position clearly and hope you continue on this track.

Your Pal,
Mark

I don't like what this modding thing has done to you.

Still waiting qpw?

I asked you first and Ive asked you before.

btw I know your just being a tool saying I shill for Real Deal but if I was why havent I mentioned Real Deal in all my 500 or so posts in the last 6 months or whatever.

Answer the question.

I know I miss those Ice Cream Sandwiches and Dinosaur pics Mark. Post a few, go on it ll be like the old days.

Um, yes, they are. You've accused people of being paid to post in this thread, and I've asked you to prove it. Of course, rather than doing so, you've sidestepped the question. And then later asked them to prove they don't work for a poker site. How the **** do you propose they do that? Would you like them to invite you to shadow them 24 hours a day for a few months? You've made the accusation, you need to prove it or stop making it.

And LOL at you responding seriously to the "Real Deal" stuff. You seriously don't understand what they're doing? You can't see they're just twisting around your techniques and using them against you?

I used to do this all the time too. I finally got tired of arguing with people that refused to listen to reason. I guess they haven't. I did it because all of the rigtards that start the "poker is rigged" threads with no evidence hurt online poker in several ways:

1) They make it more difficult for anyone else who actually has some real evidence, but is now more likely to get shouted down right away.

2) They create an environment where these people are unwilling to post, because they see the massive arguments that have erupted.

3) They may be scaring players away from the game for no reason.

4) They make truly shady sites like Cereus seem like the norm. "Well, if all online poker is rigged, I might as well play at Cereus. They have good bonuses".

I'm sure there's lots more I can't think of right now, as it's 2:37 and I'm tired.

Just to give you an idea of what we're up against and why I gave up - several months back, one of these stupid threads started up again. This was when we had several per week. But the interesting thing was that some actual discussion of real evidence started happening. So I took that thread, which started off with the usual rigtard crap, and pulled out the good stuff. I started a new "Data Analysis" thread and put all the good stuff in it. Of course, a month or two later, it died.

Sick of all the rigtard threads every week, I started merging them all together into this monstrosity we have here. Surprise, surprise, it's been a huge hit.

The rigtards have no interest in actual discussions involving logic or reason. Or evidence. They have no interest in actually doing anything about the problem they perceive. They just want somewhere that they can climb to the top of the mountain and yell "IT'S RIGGED!!!!". So, that's what we've given them. Enjoy!

I always focus on #3 of that list, but they're all good points and I never even thought about #4.

There should be a mod note in bold on the top of the first page for newbies that simply says something like: "Note: This thread doesn't contain any meaningful information, and you're probably better off not looking at it."

On a different but somewhat related subject, Penn & Teller: Bull****! is an awesome show.

Obviously a RealDeal shill would not actually make a big point of mentioning the site. That would cause suspicion.

And you haven't mentioned the site.

Which just proves that you are a shill for them

Now, please tell us how much they are paying you.

Do you get paid per post or by the amount of responses you generate? Do you get extra if someone mentions RealDeal in a response?

Can we share some of that income as I've now mentioned them a few times?

realdeal poker is rigged

Can we just change the title of the thread to "The great You Are a Shill debate"

Actually, leave the great part out.


Any chance we can get back to some actual data by spade, or on the flip side some "mind control" style sinister rigged beliefs based on 2 hands from memory instead? Then qpw can do 10-50 responses that are more in line with what this thread is supposed to be about.

I highly doubt this type of discussion has any real impact on whether players sign up or not, and it is fun to see what new and creative conspiracies can be hatched.


Thanks.

P.S. Bobo's first point is especially true. All of the noise rigtards make tend to ironically distract from genuine threats that take place like collusion and bots and fraud, and they do make it harder or anyone with actual data of cheating to be taken seriously at first.

This logic is breathtaking.

I couldn't agree with you more. But here's my point. I've written to other mods. even Sklansky himself. A lot of the arguements I post, aren't neccessarily my views or opinions. It's how it's sited as the impossible. That every single poker site would not or could not cheat or let other players cheat on their sites. It's like this, if you give me a reason or somebody else an answer that doesn't make sense and is misleading, we deserve a real credible answer from real poker players such as yourself, mark and others. I've said it many times before, if certain people wouldn't make ridiculous claims and arguements, my post count wouldn't equal a third of what it is now. Come on comparing the "thought" of online poker not being comprimised in any way is along the lines of aliens, big foot, the easter bunny and santa clause? Your points about why you hate rigtards with no evidence I couldnt agree with you more. But how can we have a logical and civil discussion when as soon as somebody comes here to "test the waters" on their speculation, immediatly get ridiculed and called a losing player.
My recent posts aren't about proving online poker is rigged. So in Mark's defense, I apologized and explained to him that most of what I post maybe true(or false), that I am simply responding and reacting to irrational logic and tactics by some users. It's a debate. Bringing discussions to the table, and analyzing any underlining arguement. If I come out and say that it kinda defeats my whole purpose. But seeing as people are being denounced for siding with me about an overall view, I think it needs to be made aware of....

How would anyone ever be able to satisfy your proof conditions of the following

Disprove that xxx is impossible

You can literally fill in xxx with any theory, in your case it is the following

Disprove that online poker rooms being rigged is impossible.

Cannot be done.


Similarly, disprove that it is impossible for aliens to exist among us cannot be done.



The reason why it gets compared to aliens and all sorts of things is because that is the exact same flawed methodology those believers use when faced with doubts. Ask someone to disprove a negative, which is impossible.


Prove aliens exist. No, you disprove that it is possible that they may exist

Prove online poker is rigged. No, you disprove that it is possible for it to not be rigged in any way.


You keep wondering why you get no answers to your "questions" but your questions have an inherent logic flaw within them making them pointless to even try to answer.

Still, if you have any idea how your requests can be answered to your satisfaction please lay out the terms.

It's not about proving or disproving anything. It's about making sure it can't and won't happen. And if any kind of cheating takes place by players or companys' then they're held accountable...No harm no foul right? Why's the such a big deal. For you guys to downplay the situation, sends across the messege to everybody that online poker doesn't need a higher authority protecting US players b/c people that question security wear tinfoil hats?

How would anyone ever be able to meet these conditions to your satisfaction. They are vague and undefined.

Complete this

To make sure it can't and won't happen, the following needs to be done:


You take this issue seriously, tell us how to do exactly what you say needs to be done. You do not have to do any of the work, simply say what work has to be done by others to make sure " it can't and won't happen."

Good luck with answering that.

Rigged lovers are great. Puts a smile on my face.

Because you are trying to get a government that has shown its utter ineptitude (along with a lot of other governments) at regulating something as serious and important as the banking system to start poking its nose into something with which a lot of people are more or less happy - at least if they pick the right site.

Trying to get governments to regulate something for which there is no pressing need (unlike, for example, drugs and and finance) is like inviting them to open a can of worms.

And it would be poker plaers who would suffer the consequences.