Troll? I've told you that I think the deal at stars is bent. How much more open would you have me be?

You really do live in a cave dont you?

This is the 'hit gutshot when all in and covering' circuit from the old MkIII handulator:



This was in service for a very short time. If you look closely you can clearly see the flaw.

You don't play poker but you invest more time here than me.
So the B&M must paid you good money to shill here!

If we were truly ignorant you will provide evidence to educated us!
But you are a complet ****** to understand what is a evidence.

+1

Im only here because my other froum( How to grow a bigger garden) is slow right now!

Gardening is rigged imo

raymears' play history actually does show some clear rigging, particularly this hand.

My apologies for doubting you. Do you coach?

lol good1

Please tell me 1 legit business WITHOUT a Customer Service PHONE NUMBER???

EVERY business category has a share that are CROOKS, Online Poker is NO different!!!

Action Cards, Action Hands to build the RAKE, House ROBOTS???

The REAL QUESTION is WHICH ONLINE POKER SITES are CROOKS???

Did the DOJ answer the question??? Why didn't they go after ALL the online sites??? Maybe they want Online Poker Legal, but wanted to weed out the bad sites first???

You're a FOOL!!!

I LIKE your USE of randomly Capitalized WORDS, it Really ADDS Emphasis.

You're an un-educated moron

Here a nice quote to you
It's the money transaction who is illegal with the US law btw who goes against the WTO treaties the US signed.
The US doesn't have the greatest reputation for playing by the rules in WTO rulings and decisions. bottom line, the US complies with the policies and rulings that the US wants to abide by, and tells the world to F off in the cases it doesn't agree with.

Who is the biggest crook the Online Poker room[International Co.] who doesn't respect a law (when this law doesn't respect WTO treaties) or a country who doesn't respect the treaties they signed?

I say to you f off


P.S i had take one sentence from cowboy.up, why rewriting the same idea

I'm at least going to give you credit for proper use of "you're". Granted, you had the pic as a guide, but it's still impressive for a riggie who just made a ridiculous post. No sarcasm, you've really set yourself apart from many.

In all seriousness, thats great, theres nothing wrong with that. But why argue with people that have played millions of hands about the unfairness of of those hands? And just for the record, I know that there are some losing players that scream rigged. I was exaggerating to illustrate my point that I believe most of the people in this thread arguing its fair are spiteful and bitter about not getting laid for the last decade.

Thats easy, the guy that knowingly violates a criminal statute in a country for profit. A violation of a trade treaty between sovereign states is not criminal conduct.

In all seriousness, thats great, theres nothing wrong with that. But why argue with people that have played millions of hands about the unfairness of of those hands? And just for the record, I know that there are some losing players that scream rigged. I was exaggerating to illustrate my point that I believe most of the people in this thread arguing its fair are spiteful and bitter about not being able to see his penis the last decade.

+1

-1

That's one SERIOUS ballbag!

How does that man get around?

It's perfectly clear where the fault lies.

There is no tamping wopple on the Keighly trunion!

And as any fool knows, this causes a polarity reversal in the flux rotibulation density sensor. Well spotted!

The 'engineer two royal flushes in a row' module is a lot more complex; certainly far too large a file to post here.

It will become a lot simpler and smaller when they transistorise it.

... but no less blatant.