old_moose,
Are you familiar with Snopes?
http://www.snopes.com One of the ways they use to distinguish a phoney story from a factual one is that a phoney story doesn't have verifiable facts in it like names, dates, locations, documentation etc. Factual stories generally do.
A real whistleblower who is puting his/her reputation, career, and under the reality of corruption, possibly his/her life on the line, is going to provide more than raw assertions. There's going to be verifiable facts. That fairytale you keep referring to as "evidence" is nothing of the sort. It is just the ramblings of some loon on the Internet. It is not evidence and you cannot claim it as such no matter how much you want to. Why on Earth would you expect me or anyone else to simply take the word of some random anomous poster on the Internet at their word for
anything much less something that goes against all mathmatical evidence?!? That's illogical. I could easily write essays in various locations on the Internet claiming to be "Susan Doe" and have inside information that the pokersites are run cleanly then cite them. Would you suddenly believe them because they are written somewhere on the Internet?
And worse yet would me to be to believe this loon so based on your say so. That's heresay.
No, you have NOT provided any evidence as you claim. And until you do you're just pretending to have any reasons for your beliefs. Instead you believe IN SPITE of the evidence. And that, sir, makes you either irrational or delusional, your choice.