Quote:
Originally Posted by onthelow
Monteroy I have a question for you.
Say you run a test on a site in various categories and majority of them fail. You have powerful data and you can be almost certain your outcomes havent been in the range of expectation.
Do you quit poker? or continue playing in the hopes of...? If thats your answer what hopes are you looking for? or would you just keep playing and say its bad luck. Even though your hard own data tells you otherwise?
This question isn't directed towards me, but I'm going to answer anyway as a fellow non-rigtard, who, for some reason hasn't been accused of being a shill... yet.
Would I quit poker? No, I'd still at least continue playing live. Would I continue online? Well, it depends:
If it's obviously a flaw (benefiting no one), not an intentional rigging, then I'd continue to play because I'd expect the site(s) to fix it as quickly as possible and because I'd expect to continue to be profitable as I have been for years. Probably even more profitable, as I might be able to exploit the flaw before it's fixed (e.g. if kings don't come up as often, then I factor that in to my decisions).
If it's a flaw that may or may not have been intentional, I'd probably move to another site until it's fixed, and then possibly move back depending on how I feel about the site's handling of the situation.
If it was shown to obviously be intentional, then I would avoid the site out of principle, just like with UB and AP.