Everleaf hates winning players too - Page 4 - Internet Poker

Yea and the biggest site that encourages winners is also one of the only sites that has dealt RB. Oh and surprise, its also bigger than the next 12 largest sites combined.

Its like these companies hate money or something. They have the perfect glaring example of how to crush the market, and they all go a different direction.

Quote

12-03-2011 , 05:33 PM

#77

WVUskinsfan

no felonies

Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 5,055

Quote:

Originally Posted by AirborneSapper9845

All winners must sit together with their entire rolls at one table called the "thunderdome". Players are not allowed to leave until either they busto or triple up.

massive lol

Quote

12-03-2011 , 05:36 PM

#78

WVUskinsfan

no felonies

Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 5,055

Is there a way we can contact everleaf rather than just the skins?

Quote

12-03-2011 , 05:38 PM

#79

sajeffe

banned

Join Date: May 2010 Posts: 5,058

Quote:

Originally Posted by MintedNeil

Hi

This change is a NETWORK wide change.

To put it into context, less than 0.004% of the entire player pool will be affected by this change. It is this 0.004% of the player pool that accounts for over 50% of the net win on the entire network.

Minted are in no way attempting to justify this decision however we are bound by the rules of the network and will embrace this change for better or for worse.

All of you, who fall into the remaining 99.996% of the player pool, will have easier games.

Regards
Neil

Wow. Just wow. So you're saying it only affects like, what? 2 people? Haha. Wow.

Quote

12-03-2011 , 05:39 PM

#80

redarator

old hand

Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 1,264

I agree that this is totally stupid.

But I just made an initial deposit being ignorant of this change. I'm going to mainly be playing 50NL on there, so will this affect me?

Quote

12-03-2011 , 05:40 PM

#81

Bobo Fett

Carpe Diem

Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 56,896

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schwatt

True. My only explanation is that they think they can't beat Stars at being Stars, so they are trying to corner an entirely different part of the market. Insert joke here about the market they're trying to corner.

Quote:

Originally Posted by WVUskinsfan

Is there a way we can contact everleaf rather than just the skins?

ManagerELG

Quote

12-03-2011 , 05:42 PM

#82

wufwugy

adept

Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 1,162

****ing disgusting

Quote

12-03-2011 , 05:42 PM

#83

AirborneSapper9845

self-banned

Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 1,447

Quote:

Originally Posted by sajeffe

Wow. Just wow. So you're saying it only affects like, what? 2 people? Haha. Wow.

According to pokerscout, Everleaf has 542 cash players right now, so according to Neil since it only affects 0.004% of the network, then 0.02 players are affected. So c'mon guys, no big deal. Only 2 hundredths of one player are affected....

Quote

12-03-2011 , 05:44 PM

#84

Mitch Evans

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 5,633

Quote:

Originally Posted by sajeffe

Wow. Just wow. So you're saying it only affects like, what? 2 people? Haha. Wow.

Yeah, like you'd think on a poker forum you wouldn't try to slip percentages by us in a euphemistic manner. In this case, it's not even accurate. 1 in 25,000 players...? Right, my ass...

Quote

12-03-2011 , 05:45 PM

#85

Malefiicus

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 6,417

Quote:

Originally Posted by MintedNeil

I assume you can't give actual numbers, but I hope you can. How many players will this affect as a actual number, not a percentage. Also, what exactly is the effect of this change? Is it, once you win 750euro it takes affect, or once you hit 3000euro on the month, with that number being reset every Sunday and the 3000euro being calculated from the 4 Mondays back? That probably didn't make sense, long week, either way, explain. I was planning to play at Minted after Bodog screwed everyone, as I was originally planning to start playing there.

On an unrelated side note, I hate political correctness and it's crippling stranglehold on jokes.

Quote

12-03-2011 , 05:47 PM

#86

starvingwriter82

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Feb 2009 Posts: 7,793

Every day I'm at Pokerstars, I think, "Wow, why is everywhere else so ****ty?"

Quote

12-03-2011 , 05:48 PM

#87

wufwugy

adept

Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 1,162

I really hope every American doesn't put another hand in at this network. This is just unbelievably bad

Quote

12-03-2011 , 05:50 PM

#88

blatantlyrigged

banned

Join Date: Mar 2011 Posts: 2,603

At least these sites are starting to show some honesty. Do you think these sites are in business to lose money? What that boils down to is limiting cash outs and setting up as many rebuys as possible. Its been going on like this ever since OLP started.

Quote

12-03-2011 , 06:19 PM

#89

dwiele

veteran

Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 3,258

everleaf is a bunch of ****ing mouth breathing idiots

Quote

12-03-2011 , 06:21 PM

#90

Theduke211

veteran

Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 3,499

In before post flop poker is removed from NLHE.

Quote

12-03-2011 , 06:34 PM

#91

dwiele

veteran

Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 3,258

in after rake is "capped" in fractions of your stack

Quote

12-03-2011 , 06:35 PM

#92

ArtySmokes

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 6,999

I thought the first post was a joke. This is just insane.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MintedNeil

To put it into context, less than 0.004% of the entire player pool will be affected by this change. It is this 0.004% of the player pool that accounts for over 50% of the net win on the entire network.

Can someone confirm that the winrate or profit is set at a fixed 750 euros/wk?
Or are they going to move the goalposts every week so that a certain % of players are effectively locked out?

Quote

12-03-2011 , 06:48 PM

#93

TheRaiderr

veteran

Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 3,055

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schwatt

I don't think that is why. Advertising, stars does more of it than the next 12 largest sites combined.

Quote

12-03-2011 , 06:51 PM

#94

dwiele

veteran

Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 3,258

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheRaiderr

I don't think that is why. Advertising, stars does more of it than the next 12 largest sites combined.

they're also 12 times better when it comes to about anything imho

Quote

12-03-2011 , 06:54 PM

#95

Mitch Evans

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 5,633

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheRaiderr

I don't think that is why. Advertising, stars does more of it than the next 12 largest sites combined.

Yeah, people are not playing on Stars because of RB. If they were, everyone would have left for wsex's 100% rakeback (dealt, too).

Quote

12-03-2011 , 07:15 PM

#96

Gemaco

old hand

Join Date: Apr 2010 Posts: 1,691

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cubicle

ROFL. What the heck is happening to poker?

You guys could always come play anonymously with us at Bodog

Quote

12-03-2011 , 07:22 PM

#97

ShipItMehr

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 3,669

Quote:

Originally Posted by rakemeplz

Interesting, can't say I'd ever imagined seeing this on an online poker table.

We're getting pwned here on Bodog as well with the anonymous tables and anti-reg stance. It's all just too damn high!

Quote

12-03-2011 , 07:28 PM

#98

TheRaiderr

veteran

Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 3,055

I wonder if the are including rakeback in the amount won. Could be why the numbers aren't making sense to some people.

Quote

12-03-2011 , 07:39 PM

#99

CallMeLucid

old hand

Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 1,828

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShipItMehr

LOLOLOLOLOL

Quote

12-03-2011 , 08:01 PM

#100

birdboysj

centurion

Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 174

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zenzor

everleaf probably having liquidity issues like FTP. can't afford to pay out big winners if they keep winning at the current rate.

only half decent post in the thread

Quote

Page 4 of 17

First

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 14

Last

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 4 of 17

First

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 14

Last